.
Want Wikipedia to look like this?   
Click here to upgrade your Wikipedia experience
2001: A Space Odyssey (film) | QuickiWiki

2001: A Space Odyssey (film)

  EN

Overview

2001: A Space Odyssey
Theatrical release poster by Robert McCall
Directed by Stanley Kubrick
Produced by Stanley Kubrick
Screenplay by
Starring
Cinematography Geoffrey Unsworth
Edited by Ray Lovejoy
Distributed by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Release dates
  • April 2, 1968 (1968-04-02) (Washington, D.C.)
  • April 3, 1968 (1968-04-03) (United States)
  • May 15, 1968 (1968-05-15) (United Kingdom)
Running time
  • 161 minutes (Premiere)[1]
  • 142 minutes (Theatrical)[2]
Country
  • United Kingdom[3]
  • United States[3]
Language English
Budget $10.5–12 million[4][5]
Box office $138–190 million[6][7]


Theatrical release poster by Robert McCall - 2001: A Space Odyssey (film)
Theatrical release poster by Robert McCall

2001: A Space Odyssey is a 1968 epic science fiction film produced and directed by Stanley Kubrick. The screenplay was written by Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke, and was partially inspired by Clarke's short story "The Sentinel". Clarke concurrently wrote the novel 2001: A Space Odyssey, which was published soon after the film was released. The film follows a voyage to Jupiter with the sentient computer Hal after the discovery of mysterious black monoliths affecting human evolution. The film deals with the themes of existentialism, human evolution, technology, artificial intelligence, and extraterrestrial life. It is noted for its scientifically accurate depiction of space flight, pioneering special effects, and ambiguous imagery. It uses minimal dialogue, and sound in place of traditional narrative techniques; the score consists of classical music such as The Blue Danube and Also sprach Zarathustra.

Financed and distributed by American studio Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer,[8][9] 2001: A Space Odyssey was made almost entirely in England, using the studio facilities of MGM's subsidiary "MGM British" and those of Shepperton Studios, mostly because of the availability of much larger sound stages than in the United States. Production was subcontracted to Kubrick's production company and care was taken that the film would be sufficiently British to qualify for subsidy from the Eady Levy.[8]:98 Having already shot his previous two films in England, Kubrick decided to settle there permanently during filming.

Despite initially receiving mixed reactions from critics and audiences, Space Odyssey garnered a cult following and slowly became the highest-grossing North American film of 1968. It was nominated for four Academy Awards, and received one for its visual effects. Today, critics and filmmakers regard it as one of the greatest and most influential films ever made. In 1991, it was deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" by the United States Library of Congress and selected for preservation in the National Film Registry.[10] The critics' polls in the 2002 and 2012 editions of Sight & Sound magazine ranked 2001: A Space Odyssey sixth in the top ten films of all time; it also tied for second place in the directors' poll of the same magazine.[11][12] In 2010, it was ranked the greatest film of all time by The Moving Arts Film Journal.[13] In 1984, a sequel directed by Peter Hyams was released, 2010: The Year We Make Contact.

TimelineBETA

Thanks 1962
Hal's version of the popular song "Daisy Bell" (referred to by Hal as "Daisy" in the film) was inspired by a computer-synthesized arrangement by Max Mathews, which Arthur C. Clarke had heard in 1962 at the Bell Laboratories Murray Hill facility when he was, coincidentally, visiting friend and colleague John R. Pierce.
Thanks 1964
April 22: Clarke's cabled response stated that he was "frightfully interested in working with enfant terrible", and added "what makes Kubrick think I'm a recluse?" Meeting for the first time at Trader Vic's in New York on April 22, 1964, the two began discussing the project that would take up the next four years of their lives.
Thanks  
October 17: Early in 1965, right when backing was secured for Journey Beyond the Stars, the writers still had no firm idea of what would happen to Bowman after the Star Gate sequence, though as early as October 17, 1964 Kubrick had come up with what Clarke called a "wild idea of slightly fag robots who create a Victorian environment to put our heroes at their ease".
Thanks 1965
February 23: Kubrick chose to announce the project, in a press release issued on February 23, 1965, as Journey Beyond The Stars.
Thanks  
April: Eleven months after they began working on the project, Kubrick selected 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Thanks  
October 3: Initially all of Discovery's astronauts were to survive the journey; a decision to leave Bowman as the sole survivor and have him regress to infancy was agreed by October 3, 1965.
Thanks  
December 29: Principal photography began December 29, 1965, in Stage H at Shepperton Studios, Shepperton, England.
Thanks 1966
January: The production moved in January 1966 to the smaller MGM-British Studios in Borehamwood, where the live action and special effects filming was done, starting with the scenes involving Floyd on the Orion spaceplane; it was described as a "huge throbbing nerve center ...
Thanks 1967
September: Filming of actors was completed in September 1967, and from June 1966 until March 1968 Kubrick spent most of his time working on the 205 special effects shots in the film.
Thanks 1968
A 1994 article in American Cinematographer says, "When Stanley Kubrick made 2001: a Space Odyssey in 1968, he claimed to have been first to fly actor/astronauts on wires with the camera on the ground, shooting vertically while the actor's body covered the wires" but observes that Klushantsev had preceded him in this.
Thanks  
March: Kubrick finished the 'pre-premiere' editing of the film, making his final cuts just days before the film's general release in April 1968.
Thanks  
April 2: Kubrick filmed several scenes that were deleted from the final film. These fall into two categories: scenes cut before any public screenings of the film, and scenes cut a few days after the world premiere on April 2, 1968.
Thanks  
April 10: Some critics viewed the original 161-minute cut shown at premieres in Washington D.C., New York, and Los Angeles, while others saw the nineteen-minute-shorter general release version that was in theatres from April 10, 1968 onwards.
Thanks  
June: An article by Douglas Trumbull about the creation of special effects for 2001 appears in the June 1968 issue of American Cinematographer.
Thanks  
December 27: Time provided at least seven different mini-reviews of the film in various issues in 1968, each one slightly more positive than the preceding one; in the final review dated December 27, 1968, the magazine called 2001 "an epic film about the history and future of mankind, brilliantly directed by Stanley Kubrick.
Thanks 1969
In an interview with Joseph Gelmis in 1969, Kubrick simply stated that "[HAL] had an acute emotional crisis because he could not accept evidence of his own fallibility".
Thanks 1971
Film critic Penelope Houston wrote in 1971 that because the novel differs in many key respects from the film, it perhaps should not be regarded as the skeleton key to unlock it.
Thanks 1972
Arthur C. Clarke kept a diary throughout his involvement with 2001, excerpts of which were published in 1972 as The Lost Worlds of 2001.
Thanks 1974
The film was re-released in 1974, 1977, and again in 1980.
Thanks 1976
Beginning in 1976, Marvel Comics published a comic adaptation of the film written and drawn by Jack Kirby, and a 10-issue monthly series expanding on the ideas of the film and novel, also created by Kirby.
Thanks 1984
The only filmed sequel, 2010, was based on Clarke's 1982 novel and was released in 1984.
Thanks 1991
This film was deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" by the United States Library of Congress and selected for preservation in the National Film Registry.
Thanks 1994
Inspired by Clarke's visual tablet device, in 1994 a European Commission-funded R&D project code named "NewsPAD" developed and pilot tested a portable 'multimedia viewer' aiming for the realisation of an electronic multimedia 'newspaper' pointing the way to a future fully interactive and highly personalised information source.
Thanks 1995
The Vatican named it as one of the 45 best films ever made (and included it in a sub-list of the "Top Ten Art Movies" of all time.)
Thanks 1996
Turner Entertainment/Rhino Records released a new soundtrack on CD which included the material from "Aventures" and restored the version of "Zarathustra" used in the film, and used the shorter version of "Lux aeterna" from the film.
Thanks 2001
Clarke says that his short story "Encounter in the Dawn" inspired the "Dawn Of Man" sequence in 2001.
Thanks 2010
It was ranked the greatest film of all time by The Moving Arts Film Journal.
Thanks  
June 25: A version of the film specially remastered by Warner Bros.
Thanks  
December: Special effects supervisor Douglas Trumbull announced that Warner Brothers had located seventeen minutes of lost footage, "perfectly preserved", in a Kansas salt mine vault that originated from the post-premiere cuts.
Thanks 2011
The film was the third most screened film in secondary schools in the United Kingdom.
Thanks  
August: In response to Apple Inc.'s patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung, the latter argued that Apple's iPad was effectively modeled on the visual tablets that appear aboard spaceship Discovery in the Space Odyssey film, which legally constitute "prior art".
Thanks 2012
Two screenplay adaptations of both 2061 and 3001 were both posted on the 2001:Exhibit website, in the hopes of generating interest in both MGM and Warner Brothers to adapt the last two novels into films.
Thanks 2013
June 14: A repeat presentation of the film accompanied by live orchestra and choir was performed at Symphony Hall in Birmingham, again accompanied by the Philharmonia Orchestra conducted by Benjamin Wallfisch together with the choir Ex Cathedra.

Videos

Plot

In an African desert, a tribe of early hominids is driven from their water hole by a rival tribe. They wake to find a featureless black monolith has appeared before them. One man-ape realizes how to use a bone as a tool and weapon; the tribe kills the leader of their rivals and reclaims the water hole.

Millions of years later, a Pan Am space plane carries Dr. Heywood R. Floyd to a space station orbiting Earth for a layover on his trip to Clavius Base, a Lunar US outpost. After a videophone call with his daughter, Floyd's Soviet scientist friend and her colleague ask him about rumors of a mysterious epidemic at Clavius. Floyd declines to answer. At Clavius, Floyd heads a meeting of base personnel, apologizing for the epidemic cover story but stressing secrecy. His mission is to investigate a recently found artifact buried four million years ago. Floyd and others ride in a Moonbus to the artifact, a monolith identical to the one encountered by the man-apes. Sunlight strikes the monolith and a loud high-pitched radio signal is heard.

Eighteen months later, the U.S. spacecraft Discovery One is bound for Jupiter. On board are mission pilots and scientists Dr. David Bowman and Dr. Frank Poole, and three other scientists in cryogenic hibernation. Most of Discovery's operations are controlled by the ship's computer, HAL 9000, referred to by the crew as "Hal". Bowman and Poole watch Hal and themselves being interviewed in a BBC show about the mission, in which the computer states that he is "foolproof and incapable of error." When asked by the host if Hal has genuine emotions, Bowman replies that he appears to, but that the truth is unknown. Hal reports the imminent failure of an antenna control device. The astronauts retrieve the component with an EVA pod but find nothing wrong with it. Hal suggests reinstalling the part and letting it fail so the problem can be found. Mission advises the astronauts that results from their twin HAL 9000 indicate that Hal is in error. Hal insists that the problem, like previous issues with the HAL series, is due to human error. Concerned about Hal's behavior, Bowman and Poole enter an EVA pod to talk without Hal overhearing, and agree to disconnect Hal if he is proven wrong. Hal secretly follows their conversation by lip reading.

While Poole attempts to replace the unit during a space-walk, his EVA pod, controlled by Hal, severs his oxygen hose and sets him adrift. Bowman takes another pod to attempt rescue, leaving his helmet behind. Hal turns off the life support functions of the crewmen in suspended animation. When Bowman returns to the ship with Poole's body, Hal refuses to let him in, stating that the astronauts' plan to deactivate him jeopardizes the mission. Bowman opens the ship's emergency airlock manually, enters the ship, and proceeds to Hal's processor core to disconnect the computer. Hal tries to reassure Bowman, then pleads with him to stop, and finally expresses fear. He eventually regresses to his earliest programmed memory, the song "Daisy Bell", which he sings for Bowman.

When Hal is finally disconnected, a pre-recorded video message from Floyd reveals the existence of the monolith on the moon. Its purpose and origin unknown, it has remained inert except for a powerful radio emission aimed at Jupiter. At Jupiter, Bowman leaves Discovery One in an EVA pod to investigate another monolith discovered in orbit around the planet. The pod is pulled into a vortex of colored light,[14] and Bowman races at speed across vast distances of space, viewing bizarre cosmological phenomena and strange landscapes of unusual colors.

He finds himself, still in the pod, in a bedroom appointed in the neoclassical style. He sees older versions of himself, his point of view switching each time, first standing in the bedroom, middle-aged, and still in his spacesuit, then formally dressed and eating dinner, and finally as an old man lying in the bed. A black monolith appears at the foot of the bed, and as Bowman reaches for it, he is transformed into a fetus enclosed in a transparent orb of light.[15] The new being floats in space beside the Earth, gazing at it.

Cast

Development

Writing

Kubrick and Clarke meet

Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke in Kubrick's apartment office on Central Park West, New York, during the writing of 2001. - 2001: A Space Odyssey (film)
Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke in Kubrick's apartment office on Central Park West, New York, during the writing of 2001.

Shortly after completing Dr. Strangelove (1964), Stanley Kubrick became fascinated by the possibility of extraterrestrial life,[17] and resolved to make "the proverbial good science fiction movie".[18] Searching for a suitable collaborator in the science fiction community, Kubrick was advised by a mutual acquaintance—Columbia Pictures staffer Roger Caras—to seek out the science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke. Although convinced that Clarke was "a recluse, a nut who lives in a tree", Kubrick agreed that Caras would cable the Ceylon-based author with the film proposal. Clarke's cabled response stated that he was "frightfully interested in working with enfant terrible", and added "what makes Kubrick think I'm a recluse?"[19][20] Meeting for the first time at Trader Vic's in New York on April 22, 1964, the two began discussing the project that would take up the next four years of their lives.[21]

Search for source material

Kubrick told Clarke he was searching for the best way to make a film about Man's relationship to the universe, and was, in Clarke's words, "determined to create a work of art which would arouse the emotions of wonder, awe, ... even, if appropriate, terror".[21] Clarke offered Kubrick six of his short stories, and by May, Kubrick had chosen "The Sentinel" as the source matter for his film. In search of more material to expand the film's plot, the two spent the rest of 1964 reading books on science and anthropology, screening science fiction films, and brainstorming ideas.[22] Clarke and Kubrick spent two years transforming "The Sentinel" into a novel, and then into a script for 2001.[23] Clarke says that his short story "Encounter in the Dawn" inspired the "Dawn Of Man" sequence in 2001.[24]

At first, Kubrick and Clarke privately referred to their project as How the Solar System Was Won as a reference to MGM's 1962 Cinerama epic, How the West Was Won. However, Kubrick chose to announce the project, in a press release issued on February 23, 1965, as Journey Beyond The Stars.[25] Clark indicated that other titles that were suggested included Universe, Tunnel to the Stars, and Planetfall. In April 1965, eleven months after they began working on the project, Kubrick selected 2001: A Space Odyssey. According to Clark, "As far as I can recall, it was entirely [Kubrick's] idea."[26] Intending to set the film apart from the standard "monsters and sex" type of science-fiction films of the time, Kubrick used Homer's The Odyssey as inspiration for the title. Kubrick said, "It occurred to us that for the Greeks the vast stretches of the sea must have had the same sort of mystery and remoteness that space has for our generation."[27]

Parallel development of film and novelization

The collaborators originally planned to develop a novel first, free of the constraints of a normal script, and then to write the screenplay; they envisaged that the final writing credits would be "Screenplay by Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke, based on a novel by Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick" to reflect their preeminence in their respective fields.[28] In practice, however, the cinematic ideas required for the screenplay developed parallel to the novel, with cross-fertilization between the two. In a 1970 interview with Joseph Gelmis, Kubrick explained:

There are a number of differences between the book and the movie. The novel, for example, attempts to explain things much more explicitly than the film does, which is inevitable in a verbal medium. The novel came about after we did a 130-page prose treatment of the film at the very outset. This initial treatment was subsequently changed in the screenplay, and the screenplay in turn was altered during the making of the film. But Arthur took all the existing material, plus an impression of some of the rushes, and wrote the novel. As a result, there's a difference between the novel and the film ... I think that the divergences between the two works are interesting.[29]

In the end, the screenplay credits were shared while the novel, released shortly after the film, was attributed to Clarke alone, but Clarke wrote later that "the nearest approximation to the complicated truth" is that the screenplay should be credited to "Kubrick and Clarke" and the novel to "Clarke and Kubrick".[30]

Clarke and Kubrick wrote the novel and screenplay simultaneously, but while Clarke ultimately opted for clearer explanations of the mysterious monolith and Star Gate in his book, Kubrick chose to make his film more cryptic and enigmatic by keeping dialogue and specific explanations to a minimum.[31] "2001", Kubrick says, "is basically a visual, nonverbal experience" that avoids the spoken word in order to reach the viewer's subconscious in an essentially poetic and philosophic way. The film is a subjective experience which "hits the viewer at an inner level of consciousness, just as music does, or painting".[32]

How much would we appreciate La Gioconda [the Mona Lisa] today if Leonardo had written at the bottom of the canvas: This lady is smiling slightly because she has rotten teeth or because she's hiding a secret from her lover? It would shut off the viewer's appreciation and shackle him to a reality other than his own. I don't want that to happen to 2001. —Stanley Kubrick[33]

Depiction of alien life

Astronomer Carl Sagan wrote in his book, The Cosmic Connection, that Clarke and Kubrick asked his opinion on how to best depict extraterrestrial intelligence. Sagan, while acknowledging Kubrick's desire to use actors to portray humanoid aliens for convenience's sake, argued that alien life forms were unlikely to bear any resemblance to terrestrial life, and that to do so would introduce "at least an element of falseness" to the film. Sagan proposed that the film suggest, rather than depict, extraterrestrial superintelligence. He attended the premiere and was "pleased to see that I had been of some help."[34] Kubrick hinted at the nature of the mysterious unseen alien race in 2001 by suggesting, in a 1968 interview, that given millions of years of evolution, they progressed from biological beings to "immortal machine entities", and then into "beings of pure energy and spirit"; beings with "limitless capabilities and ungraspable intelligence".[35]

Stages of script and novel development

Arthur C. Clarke kept a diary throughout his involvement with 2001, excerpts of which were published in 1972 as The Lost Worlds of 2001. The script went through many stages of development in which various plot ideas were considered and subsequently discarded. Early in 1965, right when backing was secured for Journey Beyond the Stars, the writers still had no firm idea of what would happen to Bowman after the Star Gate sequence, though as early as October 17, 1964 Kubrick had come up with what Clarke called a "wild idea of slightly fag robots who create a Victorian environment to put our heroes at their ease".[30] Initially all of Discovery's astronauts were to survive the journey; a decision to leave Bowman as the sole survivor and have him regress to infancy was agreed by October 3, 1965. The computer HAL 9000 was originally to have been named "Athena", after the Greek goddess of wisdom, with a feminine voice and persona.[30]

Early drafts included a short prologue containing interviews with scientists about extraterrestrial life,[36] voice-over narration (a feature in all of Kubrick's previous films),[37] a stronger emphasis on the prevailing Cold War balance of terror, a slightly different and more explicitly explained scenario for Hal's breakdown,[38][39][40] and a differently envisaged monolith for the "Dawn of Man" sequence. The last three of these survived into Arthur C. Clarke's final novel, which also retained an earlier draft's employment of Saturn as the final destination of the Discovery mission rather than Jupiter, and the discarded finale of the Star Child exploding nuclear weapons carried by Earth-orbiting satellites.[40] Clarke had suggested this finale to Kubrick, jokingly calling it "Son of Dr. Strangelove"; a reference to Kubrick's previous film. Feeling that this conclusion's similarity to that of his previous film would be detrimental, Kubrick opted for a more pacific conclusion.[36]

Some changes were made simply due to the logistics of filming. Early prototypes of the monolith did not photograph well, while the special effects team was unable to develop a convincing rendition of Saturn's rings; hence the switch to Jupiter[41] (in his foreword to the 1990 edition of the novel, Clarke wrote that if they had remained with Saturn, the film would have become far more dated as Voyager revealed that Saturn's rings were far more visually bizarre in closeup than anyone had imagined). Other changes were made due to Stanley Kubrick's increasing desire to make the film more non-verbal, reaching the viewer at a visual and visceral level rather than through conventional narrative.[42] Vincent LeBrutto writes that Clarke's novel has "strong narrative structure" which fleshes out the story, while the film is a mainly visual experience where much remains "symbolic".[43]

Remnants of early drafts in final film

While many ideas were discarded in totality, at least two remnants of previous plot ideas remain in the final film.

HAL's breakdown[edit]

While the film leaves it mysterious, early script drafts spell out that HAL's breakdown is triggered by authorities on Earth who had ordered him to withhold information from the astronauts about the true purpose of the mission (this is also explained in the film's sequel 2010). Frederick Ordway, Kubrick's science advisor and technical consultant, working from personal copies of early drafts, stated that in an earlier version, Poole tells HAL there is "... something about this mission that we weren't told. Something the rest of the crew knows and that you know. We would like to know whether this is true", to which HAL enigmatically responds: "I'm sorry, Frank, but I don't think I can answer that question without knowing everything that all of you know."[38] In this version, HAL then falsely predicts a failure of the hardware maintaining radio contact with Earth (the source of HAL's difficult orders) during the broadcast of Frank Poole's birthday greetings from his parents.

The film drops this overt explanation, but it is hinted at when HAL asks David Bowman if the latter feels bothered or disturbed by the "mysteries" and "secrecy" surrounding the mission and its preparations. After Bowman concludes that HAL is dutifully drawing up the "crew psychology report", the computer then makes his false prediction of hardware failure. Another hint occurs at the moment of HAL's expiration when a video plays and reveals the true purpose of the mission which he had been ordered to keep secret.

In an interview with Joseph Gelmis in 1969, Kubrick simply stated that "[HAL] had an acute emotional crisis because he could not accept evidence of his own fallibility".[44]

Military nature of orbiting satellites[edit]

Stanley Kubrick originally intended that when the film does its match-cut from ancient bone-weapon to orbiting satellite that the latter and the three additional technological satellites seen would be established as orbiting nuclear weapons by a voice-over narrator talking about nuclear stalemate.[45] Further, Kubrick intended that the Star Child would detonate the weapons at the end of the film.[46] Over time, Kubrick decided that this would create too many associations with his previous film Dr. Strangelove and he decided not to make it so obvious that they were "war machines".[47] Kubrick was also confronted with the fact that only a few weeks before the release of the film, the U.S. and Soviet governments had agreed not to put any nuclear weapons into outer space.

In a book he wrote with Kubrick's assistance and authorization, Alexander Walker states that Kubrick eventually decided that as nuclear weapons the bombs had "no place at all in the film's thematic development", now being an "orbiting red herring" which would "merely have raised irrelevant questions to suggest this as a reality of the twenty-first century".[48]

The perception that the satellites are bombs persists in the mind of some but by no means all commentators on the film. This may affect one's reading of the film as a whole. Kubrick authority Michel Ciment, in discussing Kubrick's attitude toward human aggression and instinct, observes "The bone cast into the air by the ape (now become a man) is transformed at the other extreme of civilization, by one of those abrupt ellipses characteristic of the director, into a spacecraft on its way to the moon."[49] In contrast to Ciment's reading of a cut to a serene "other extreme of civilization", science fiction novelist Robert Sawyer, speaking in the Canadian documentary 2001 and Beyond, sees it as a cut from a bone to a nuclear weapons platform, explaining that "what we see is not how far we've leaped ahead, what we see is that today, '2001', and four million years ago on the African veldt, it's exactly the same—the power of mankind is the power of its weapons. It's a continuation, not a discontinuity in that jump."[50]

Kubrick, notoriously reluctant to provide any explanation of his work, never publicly stated the intended functions of the satellites, preferring to let the viewer surmise what their purpose might be.

Dialogue

Alongside its use of music, the lack of dialogue and conventional narrative cues in 2001 has been described by many reviewers.[51] There is no dialogue at all for both the first and last 20 minutes or so of the film; the total narrative of these sections is carried entirely by images, actions, sound effects, a great deal of music (See Music) and two title cards. The first line of dialogue is the space-station stewardess addressing Heywood Floyd saying "Here you are, sir. Main level D." The final line is Floyd's conclusion of the pre-recorded Jupiter mission briefing about the monolith. "Except for a single, very powerful radio emission, aimed at Jupiter, the four-million-year-old black monolith has remained completely inert, its origin—and purpose—still a total mystery."

Only when the film moves into the postulated future of 2000 and 2001, does the viewer encounter characters who speak. By the time shooting began, Kubrick had deliberately jettisoned much of the intended dialogue and narration and what remains is notable for its apparent banality (making the computer Hal seem to have more human emotion than the actual humans), while it is juxtaposed with epic scenes of space.[52] The first scenes of dialogue are Floyd's three encounters on the space station. They are preceded by the space docking sequence choreographed to Strauss' The Blue Danube waltz and followed by a second extended sequence of his travel to the Moon with more Strauss, the two sequences acting as bookends to his space-station stop-over. The stop-over itself features idle chit-chat with the colleague who greets him followed by Floyd's slightly more affectionate telephone call to his daughter, and the distantly friendly but awkwardly strained encounter with Soviet scientists. Later, en route to the monolith, Floyd engages in trite exchanges with his staff while a spectacular journey by Earth-light across the Lunar surface is shown. Generally, the most memorable dialogue in the film belongs to the computer Hal in its exchanges with David Bowman.[53] Hal is the only character in the film who openly expresses anxiety (primarily around his disconnection), as well as feelings of pride and bewilderment.

Production

Filming

Principal photography began December 29, 1965, in Stage H at Shepperton Studios, Shepperton, England. The studio was chosen because it could house the 60'x 120'x 60' pit for the Tycho crater excavation scene, the first to be shot.[54][55] The production moved in January 1966 to the smaller MGM-British Studios in Borehamwood, where the live action and special effects filming was done, starting with the scenes involving Floyd on the Orion spaceplane;[56] it was described as a "huge throbbing nerve center ... with much the same frenetic atmosphere as a Cape Kennedy blockhouse during the final stages of Countdown."[57] The only scene not filmed in a studio—and the last live-action scene shot for the film—was the skull-smashing sequence, in which Moonwatcher (Richter) wields his new-found bone "weapon-tool" against a pile of nearby animal bones. A small elevated platform was built in a field near the studio so that the camera could shoot upward with the sky as background, avoiding cars and trucks passing by in the distance.[58][59]

Filming of actors was completed in September 1967,[60] and from June 1966 until March 1968 Kubrick spent most of his time working on the 205 special effects shots in the film.[29] The director ordered the special effects technicians on 2001 to use the painstaking process of creating all visual effects seen in the film "in camera", avoiding degraded picture quality from the use of blue screen and traveling matte techniques. Although this technique, known as "held takes", resulted in a much better image, it meant exposed film would be stored for long periods of time between shots, sometimes as long as a year.[61] In March 1968, Kubrick finished the 'pre-premiere' editing of the film, making his final cuts just days before the film's general release in April 1968.[29]

The film was initially planned to be photographed in 3-film-strip Cinerama (like How the West Was Won), because it was a part of a production/distribution deal between MGM and Cinerama Releasing corporation, but that was changed to Super Panavision 70 (which uses a single-strip 65 mm negative) on the advice of special photographic effects supervisor Douglas Trumbull, due to distortion problems with the 3-strip system.[62] Color processing and 35 mm release prints were done using Technicolor's dye transfer process. The 70 mm prints were made by MGM Laboratories, Inc. on Metrocolor. The production was $4.5 million over the initial $6.0 million budget, and sixteen months behind schedule.[54]

The Russian documentarian Pavel Klushantsev made a ground-breaking film in the 1950s entitled Road to the Stars. It is believed to have significantly influenced Kubrick's technique in 2001: A Space Odyssey, particularly in its accurate depiction of weightlessness and a rotating space station. Encyclopedia Astronautica describes some scenes from 2001 as a "shot-for-shot duplication of Road to the Stars".[63] Specific comparisons of shots from the two films have been analyzed by the filmmaker Alessandro Cima.[64] A 1994 article in American Cinematographer says, "When Stanley Kubrick made 2001: a Space Odyssey in 1968, he claimed to have been first to fly actor/astronauts on wires with the camera on the ground, shooting vertically while the actor's body covered the wires" but observes that Klushantsev had preceded him in this.[65]

For the opening sequence involving tribes of apes, professional mime Daniel Richter in addition to playing the lead ape was also responsible for choreographing the movements of the other man-apes, who were mostly portrayed by his standing mime troupe.[58]

Set design and furnishings

Kubrick involved himself in every aspect of production, even choosing the fabric for his actors' costumes,[66] and selecting notable pieces of contemporary furniture for use in the film. When Floyd exits the Space Station V elevator, he is greeted by an attendant seated behind a slightly modified George Nelson Action Office desk from Herman Miller's 1964 "Action Office" series.[67] First introduced in 1968, the Action Office style "cubicle" would eventually occupy 70 percent of office space by the mid-2000s.[68][69] Danish designer Arne Jacobsen designed the cutlery used by the Discovery astronauts in the film.[70][71][72]

Other examples of modern furniture in the film are the bright red Djinn chairs seen prominently throughout the space station[73][74] and Eero Saarinen's 1956 pedestal tables. Olivier Mourgue, designer of the Djinn chair, has been using the connection to 2001 in his advertising; a frame from the film's space station sequence and three production stills appear on the homepage of Mourgue's website.[75] Shortly before Kubrick's death, film critic Alexander Walker informed Kubrick of Mourgue's use of the film, joking to him "You're keeping the price up".[76] Commenting on their use in the film, Walker writes:

Everyone recalls one early sequence in the film, the space hotel,[77] primarily because the custom-made Olivier Mourgue furnishings, those foam-filled sofas, undulant and serpentine, are covered in scarlet fabric and are the first stabs of color one sees. They resemble Rorschach "blots" against the pristine purity of the rest of the lobby.[78]

Detailed instructions in relatively small print for various technological devices appear at several points in the film, the most visible of which are the lengthy instructions for the zero-gravity toilet on the Aries Moon shuttle. Similar detailed instructions for replacing the explosive bolts also appear on the hatches of the E.V.A. pods, most visibly in closeup just before Bowman's pod leaves the ship to rescue Frank Poole.[79]

The film features an extensive use of Eurostile Bold Extended, Futura and other sans typefaces as design elements of the 2001 world.[80] Computer displays show high resolution fonts, color and graphics—far in advance of computers in the 1960s when the film was made.

Special effects

As the film climaxes, Bowman takes a trip through deep space that involves the innovative use of slit-scan photography to create the visual effects and disturbing sequences of him noticeably stunned at what he's experiencing.

Problems playing this file? See media help.

The first director to use front projection with retroreflective matting in a mainstream film, Kubrick chose the technique to produce the backdrops for the African scenes showing ape-men against vast natural-terrain backgrounds, as traditional techniques such as painted backdrops or rear-projection did not produce the realistic look Kubrick demanded. In addition to the "Dawn of Man" sequence, the front-projection system was used to depict astronauts walking on the Lunar surface with the Moon base in the background.[81] The technique has been used widely in the film industry since 2001 pioneered its use, although starting in the 1990s it has been increasingly replaced by blue/green screen systems.

The front projection technique used by Kubrick consisted of a separate scenery projector set precisely at a right angle to the camera, and a half-silvered mirror placed at an angle in front of the camera that reflected the projected image forward, directly in line with the camera lens, onto a backdrop made of specially designed retroreflective material. The highly reflective and extremely directional screen behind the actors was capable of reflecting light from the projected image one hundred times more efficiently than did the foreground subject. The lighting of the foreground subject then had to be balanced with that of the image from the screen, rendering the image from the scenery projector on the subject too faint to record. Kubrick said that an exception was the eyes of the leopard in the "Dawn of Man" sequence, which glowed orange as a result of illumination by the scenery projector. He described this as "a happy accident".[82]

Front projection had been used in smaller settings before 2001, mostly for still-photography or television production, using small still images and projectors. The expansive backdrops for the African scenes required a screen 40 feet (12 m) tall and 110 feet (34 m) wide, far larger than had ever been used before. When the reflective material was applied to the backdrop in 100-foot (30 m) strips, however, variations at the seams of the strips led to obvious visual artifacts, a problem that was solved by tearing the material into smaller chunks and applying them in a random "camouflage" pattern on the backdrop. The existing projectors using 4-×-5-inch (10 × 13 cm) transparencies resulted in grainy images when projected that large, so the 2001 team worked with MGM's Special Effects Supervisor, Tom Howard, to build a custom projector using 8-×-10-inch (20 × 25 cm) transparencies, which required the largest water-cooled arc lamp available.[82]

Other "in-camera" shots were scenes depicting spacecraft moving through space. The camera used to shoot the stationary model of the Discovery One spacecraft was driven along a track on a special mount, the motor of which was mechanically linked to the camera motor—making it possible to repeat camera moves and match speeds exactly. On the first pass, the model was unlit, masking the star-field behind it. The camera and film were returned to the start position, and on the second pass, the model was lit without the star field. For shots also showing the interior of the ship, a third pass was made with previously-filmed live-action scenes projected onto rear-projection screens in the model's windows. The result was a film negative image that was exceptionally sharper and clearer than typical visual effects of the time.[83]

The &quotcentrifuge" set used for filming scenes depicting interior of the spaceship Discovery - 2001: A Space Odyssey (film)
The "centrifuge" set used for filming scenes depicting interior of the spaceship Discovery

For interior shots inside the spacecraft, ostensibly containing a giant centrifuge that produces artificial gravity, Kubrick had a 30-short-ton (27 t) rotating "ferris wheel" built by Vickers-Armstrong Engineering Group at a cost of $750,000. The set was 38 feet (12 m) in diameter and 10 feet (3.0 m) wide.[84] Various scenes in the Discovery centrifuge were shot by securing set pieces within the wheel, then rotating it while the actor walked or ran in sync with its motion, keeping him at the bottom of the wheel as it turned. The camera could be fixed to the inside of the rotating wheel to show the actor walking completely "around" the set, or mounted in such a way that the wheel rotated independently of the stationary camera, as in the jogging scene where the camera appears to alternately precede and follow the running actor. The shots where the actors appear on opposite sides of the wheel required one of the actors to be strapped securely into place at the "top" of the wheel as it moved to allow the other actor to walk to the "bottom" of the wheel to join him. The most notable case is when Bowman enters the centrifuge from the central hub on a ladder, and joins Poole, who is eating on the other side of the centrifuge. This required Gary Lockwood to be strapped into a seat while Keir Dullea walked toward him from the opposite side of the wheel as it turned with him.[85]

Another rotating set appeared in an earlier sequence on board the Aries transLunar shuttle. A stewardess is shown preparing in-flight meals, then carrying them into a circular walkway. Attached to the set as it rotates 180 degrees, the camera's point of view remains constant, and she appears to walk up the "side" of the circular walkway, and steps, now in an "upside-down" orientation, into a connecting hallway.[86]

The realistic-looking effects of the astronauts floating weightless in space and inside the spacecraft were accomplished by suspending the actors from wires attached to the top of the set, with the camera underneath them pointing up. The actors' bodies blocked the camera's view of the suspension wires, creating a very believable appearance of floating. For the shot of Poole floating into the pod's arms during Bowman's rescue attempt, a stuntman replaced a dummy on the wire to realistically portray the movements of an unconscious human, and was shot in slow motion to enhance the illusion of drifting through space.[87] The scene showing Bowman entering the emergency airlock from the E.V.A. pod was done in a similar way, with an off-camera stagehand, standing on a platform, holding the wire suspending Dullea above the camera positioned at the bottom of the vertically configured airlock. At the proper moment, the stagehand first loosened his grip on the wire, causing Dullea to fall toward the camera, then, while holding the wire firmly, he jumped off the platform, causing Dullea to ascend back up toward the hatch.[88]

The &quotStar Gate" sequence, one of many ground-breaking visual effects. It was primarily for these that Stanley Kubrick won his only personal Academy Award. - 2001: A Space Odyssey (film)
The "Star Gate" sequence, one of many ground-breaking visual effects. It was primarily for these that Stanley Kubrick won his only personal Academy Award.

The colored lights in the Star Gate sequence were accomplished by slit-scan photography of thousands of high-contrast images on film, including op-art paintings, architectural drawings, Moiré patterns, printed circuits, and crystal structures. Known to staff as "Manhattan Project", the shots of various nebula-like phenomena, including the expanding star field, were colored paints and chemicals swirling in a pool-like device known as a cloud tank, shot in slow-motion in a dark room.[89] The live-action landscape shots in the 'Star Gate' sequence were filmed in the Hebridean islands, the mountains of northern Scotland, and Monument Valley (U.S.A.). The strange coloring and negative-image effects in these shots were achieved by the use of different color filters in the process of making dupe negatives.[90]

An article by Douglas Trumbull about the creation of special effects for 2001 appears in the June 1968 issue of American Cinematographer.[91]

Music

Main article: 2001: A Space Odyssey (soundtrack). See also: 2001: A Space Odyssey (score).

Music plays a crucial part in 2001, and not only because of the relatively sparse dialogue. From very early on in production, Kubrick decided that he wanted the film to be a primarily nonverbal experience,[92] one that did not rely on the traditional techniques of narrative cinema, and in which music would play a vital role in evoking particular moods. About half the music in the film appears either before the first line of dialogue or after the final line. Almost no music is heard during any scenes with dialogue.

The film is notable for its innovative use of classical music taken from existing commercial recordings. Most feature films then and now are typically accompanied by elaborate film scores or songs written especially for them by professional composers. In the early stages of production, Kubrick had actually commissioned a score for 2001 from Hollywood composer Alex North, who had written the score for Spartacus and also worked on Dr. Strangelove.[93] However, during postproduction, Kubrick chose to abandon North's music in favor of the now-familiar classical pieces he had earlier chosen as "guide pieces" for the soundtrack. North did not know of the abandonment of the score until after he saw the film's premiere screening.[94]

Also engaged to score the film was composer Frank Cordell. Cordell stated in interviews that the score would primarily consist of arrangements of Gustav Mahler works.[95] This score remains unreleased. Like North's score, Cordell's work was recorded at the now demolished Anvil, Denham studios.[96]

2001 is particularly remembered for using pieces of Johann Strauss II's best-known waltz, The Blue Danube, during the extended space-station docking and Lunar landing sequences. This is the result of the association that Kubrick made between the spinning motion of the satellites and the dancers of waltzes.[97] It also makes use of the opening from the Richard Strauss tone poem Also sprach Zarathustra[98] performed by the Vienna Philharmonic conducted by Herbert von Karajan. The use of the symphonic poem Also sprach Zarathustra by Richard Strauss may be a reference to the theme of mankind's eventual replacement by supermen (Übermensch) in Nietzsche's work Thus Spoke Zarathustra.[31][99] Gayane's Adagio from Aram Khachaturian's Gayane ballet suite is heard during the sections that introduce Bowman and Poole aboard the Discovery conveying a somewhat lonely and mournful quality.

In addition to the majestic yet fairly traditional compositions by the two Strausses and Khachaturian, Kubrick used four highly modernistic compositions by György Ligeti that employ micropolyphony, the use of sustained dissonant chords that shift slowly. This technique was pioneered in Atmosphères, the only Ligeti piece heard in its entirety in the film. Ligeti admired Kubrick's film but, in addition to being irritated by Kubrick's failure to obtain permission directly from him, he was offended that his music was used in a film soundtrack shared by composers Johann and Richard Strauss.[100] Other music used is Ligeti's Lux Aeterna, the second movement of his Requiem and an electronically altered form of his Aventures, the last of which was also used without Ligeti's permission and is not listed in the film's credits.[101]

Hal's version of the popular song "Daisy Bell" (referred to by Hal as "Daisy" in the film) was inspired by a computer-synthesized arrangement by Max Mathews, which Arthur C. Clarke had heard in 1962 at the Bell Laboratories Murray Hill facility when he was, coincidentally, visiting friend and colleague John R. Pierce. At that time, a speech synthesis demonstration was being performed by physicist John Larry Kelly, Jr., by using an IBM 704 computer to synthesize speech. Kelly's voice recorder synthesizer vocoder recreated the song "Daisy Bell" ("Bicycle Built For Two"), with Max Mathews providing the musical accompaniment. Arthur C. Clarke was so impressed that he later used it in the screenplay and novel."[102]

Many non-English language versions of the film do not use the song "Daisy". In the French soundtrack, Hal sings the French folk song "Au Clair de la Lune" while being disconnected.[103] In the German version, Hal sings the children's song "Hänschen klein" ("Johnny Little"),[104] and in the Italian version Hal sings "Giro giro tondo" (Ring a Ring o' Roses).[105]

A recording of British light music composer Sidney Torch's "Off Beat Moods" was chosen by Kubrick as the theme for the fictitious B.B.C. news programme "The World Tonight" seen aboard the Discovery.[106]

On June 25, 2010, a version of the film specially remastered by Warner Bros. without the music soundtrack opened the three hundred and fiftieth anniversary celebrations of the Royal Society at Southbank Centre in cooperation with the British Film Institute, with the score played live by the Philharmonia Orchestra and Choir.[107]

On June 14, 2013, a repeat presentation of the film accompanied by live orchestra and choir was performed at Symphony Hall in Birmingham, again accompanied by the Philharmonia Orchestra conducted by Benjamin Wallfisch together with the choir Ex Cathedra.[108]

Editing

Kubrick filmed several scenes that were deleted from the final film. These fall into two categories: scenes cut before any public screenings of the film, and scenes cut a few days after the world premiere on April 2, 1968.[109] The first ('pre-premiere') set of cuts included a school-room on the Lunar base—a painting class that included Kubrick's daughters, additional scenes of life on the base, and Floyd buying a bush baby from a department store via videophone for his daughter. Additionally, a ten-minute black-and-white opening sequence featuring interviews with actual scientists, including Freeman Dyson discussing off-Earth life,[110] were removed after an early screening for MGM executives.[111] The actual text survives in the book The Making of Kubrick's 2001 by Jerome Agel.[112] The second ('post-premiere') set of cuts included details about the daily life on Discovery: additional space-walks, astronaut Bowman retrieving a spare part from an octagonal corridor, elements from the Poole murder sequence including the entire space-walk preparation and shots of Hal turning off radio contact with Poole, and a close-up of Bowman picking up a slipper during his walk in the alien room.[113]

Kubrick's rationale for editing the film was to tighten the narrative. Reviews suggested the film suffered too much by the radical departure from traditional cinematic story-telling conventions. Regarding the cuts, Kubrick stated, "I didn't believe that the trims made a critical difference. ... The people who like it, like it no matter what its length, and the same holds true for the people who hate it".[111] As was typical of most films of that era released both as a "road-show" (in Cinerama format in the case of Space Odyssey) and subsequently put into general release (in seventy-millimetre in the case of Odyssey), the entrance music, intermission music (and intermission altogether), and postcredit exit music were cut from most prints of the latter version, although these have been restored to most DVD releases.[114][115]

According to Kubrick's brother-in-law Jan Harlan, the director was adamant the trims were never to be seen, and that he "even burned the negatives"—which he had kept in his garage—shortly before his death. This is confirmed by former Kubrick assistant Leon Vitali: "I'll tell you right now, okay, on Clockwork Orange, The Shining, Barry Lyndon, some little parts of 2001, we had thousands of cans of negative outtakes and print, which we had stored in an area at his house where we worked out of, which he personally supervised the loading of it to a truck and then I went down to a big industrial waste lot and burned it. That's what he wanted."[116] In December 2010, special effects supervisor Douglas Trumbull announced that Warner Brothers had located seventeen minutes of lost footage, "perfectly preserved", in a Kansas salt mine vault that originated from the post-premiere cuts.[117][2] No immediate plans have been announced for the footage.[118]

Soundtrack

The initial MGM soundtrack album release contained none of the material from the altered and uncredited rendition of "Aventures", used a different recording of "Also sprach Zarathustra" than that heard in the film, this time performed by the Berlin Philharmonic conducted by Karl Böhm, and a longer excerpt of "Lux aeterna" than that in the film.

In 1996, Turner Entertainment/Rhino Records released a new soundtrack on CD which included the material from "Aventures" and restored the version of "Zarathustra" used in the film, and used the shorter version of "Lux aeterna" from the film. As additional "bonus tracks" at the end, this CD includes the versions of "Zarathustra" and "Lux aeterna" on the old MGM soundtrack, an unaltered performance of "Aventures", and a nine-minute compilation of all of Hal's dialogue from the film.

North's unused music had its first public appearance in Telarc's issue of the main theme on Hollywood's Greatest Hits, Vol. 2, a compilation album by Erich Kunzel and the Cincinnati Pops Orchestra. All the music North originally wrote was recorded commercially by North's friend and colleague Jerry Goldsmith with the National Philharmonic Orchestra and was released on Varèse Sarabande CDs shortly after Telarc's first theme release but before North's death. Eventually, a mono mix-down of North's original recordings, which had survived in the interim, would be released as a limited-edition CD by Intrada Records.[119]

Release

Theatrical run

The film's world premiere was on April 2, 1968, at the Uptown Theater in Washington, D.C. It opened two days later at the Warner Cinerama Theatre in Hollywood, and Loew's Capitol in New York. Kubrick then deleted nineteen minutes of footage from the film before its general release in five other U.S. cities on April 10, 1968, and internationally in five cities the following day,[2][120] where it was shown in 70mm format, with a six-track stereo magnetic soundtrack, and projected in the 2.21:1 aspect ratio. The general release of the film in its 35mm anamorphic format took place in autumn 1968, with either a four-track magnetic stereo soundtrack or an optical monaural soundtrack.[121]

The original seventy-millimetre release, like many Super Panavision 70 films of the era such as Grand Prix, was advertised as being in "Cinerama" in cinemas equipped with special projection optics and a deeply curved screen. In standard cinemas, the film was identified as a seventy-millimetre production. The original release of 2001: A Space Odyssey in seventy-millimetre Cinerama with six-track sound played continually for more than a year in several venues, and for one hundred and three weeks in Los Angeles.[122]

The following year, 2001 was appointed by a United States Department of State committee to be the American entry at the 6th Moscow International Film Festival.[123] The film was re-released in 1974, 1977, and again in 1980.[124] Once 2001, the film's timeset, arrived, a restoration of the seventy-millimetre version was screened at the Ebert's Overlooked Film Festival, and the production was also reissued to selected film houses in North America, Europe and Asia.[125][126]

Home video

The film has been released in several forms:

  • In 1980 MGM/CBS Home Video released the film on VHS and Betamax home video.[127]
  • In 1997, it was re-released on VHS, and as part of the "Stanley Kubrick Collection" in both VHS format (1999) and DVD (2000) with remastered sound and picture. In some video releases, three title cards were added to the three "blank screen" moments; "OVERTURE" at the beginning, "ENTR'ACTE" during the intermission, and "EXIT MUSIC" after the closing credits.[128]

Additionally, the film was released in high definition on both HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc.[129]

Reception

Box-office

The film earned $8.5 million in theatrical gross rental from roadshow engagements throughout 1968,[124][130] contributing to North American rentals of $15 million during its original release.[7] Reissues have brought its cumulative exhibition gross to $56.9 million in North America,[5] and over $190 million worldwide.[7]

Critical reaction

Upon release, 2001 polarized critical opinion, receiving both ecstatic praise and vehement derision. Some critics viewed the original 161-minute cut shown at premieres in Washington D.C., New York, and Los Angeles,[1] while others saw the nineteen-minute-shorter general release version that was in theatres from April 10, 1968 onwards.[120]

In The New Yorker, Penelope Gilliatt said it was "some kind of great film, and an unforgettable endeavor ... The film is hypnotically entertaining, and it is funny without once being gaggy, but it is also rather harrowing."[131] Charles Champlin of the Los Angeles Times opined that it was "the picture that science fiction fans of every age and in every corner of the world have prayed (sometimes forlornly) that the industry might some day give them. It is an ultimate statement of the science fiction film, an awesome realization of the spatial future ... it is a milestone, a landmark for a spacemark, in the art of film."[132] Louise Sweeney of The Christian Science Monitor felt that 2001 was "a brilliant intergalactic satire on modern technology. It's also a dazzling 160-minute tour on the Kubrick filmship through the universe out there beyond our earth."[133] Philip French wrote that the film was "perhaps the first multi-million-dollar supercolossal movie since D.W. Griffith's Intolerance fifty years ago which can be regarded as the work of one man ...Space Odyssey is important as the high-water mark of science-fiction movie making, or at least of the genre's futuristic branch."[134] The Boston Globe's review indicated that it was "the world's most extraordinary film. Nothing like it has ever been shown in Boston before or, for that matter, anywhere ... The film is as exciting as the discovery of a new dimension in life."[135] Roger Ebert gave the film four stars in his original review, believing the film "succeeds magnificently on a cosmic scale."[53] He later put it on his Top 10 list for Sight & Sound.[136] Time provided at least seven different mini-reviews of the film in various issues in 1968, each one slightly more positive than the preceding one; in the final review dated December 27, 1968, the magazine called 2001 "an epic film about the history and future of mankind, brilliantly directed by Stanley Kubrick. The special effects are mindblowing."[137] Director Martin Scorsese has also listed it as one of his favourite films of all time.[138] Critic David Denby later compared Kubrick to the monolith from 2001: A Space Odyssey, calling him "a force of supernatural intelligence, appearing at great intervals amid high-pitched shrieks, who gives the world a violent kick up the next rung of the evolutionary ladder".[139]

Pauline Kael said it was "a monumentally unimaginative movie",[140] and Stanley Kauffmann of The New Republic called it "a film that is so dull, it even dulls our interest in the technical ingenuity for the sake of which Kubrick has allowed it to become dull."[141] Renata Adler of The New York Times wrote that it was "somewhere between hypnotic and immensely boring."[142] Variety's 'Robe' believed the film was a "Big, beautiful, but plodding sci-fi epic ... A major achievement in cinematography and special effects, 2001 lacks dramatic appeal to a large degree and only conveys suspense after the halfway mark."[143] Andrew Sarris called it "one of the grimmest films I have ever seen in my life ...2001 is a disaster because it is much too abstract to make its abstract points."[144] (Sarris reversed his opinion upon a second viewing of the film, and declared, "2001 is indeed a major work by a major artist."[145]) John Simon felt it was "a regrettable failure, although not a total one. This film is fascinating when it concentrates on apes or machines ... and dreadful when it deals with the in-betweens: humans ...2001, for all its lively visual and mechanical spectacle, is a kind of space-Spartacus and, more pretentious still, a shaggy God story."[146] Eminent historian Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. deemed the film "morally pretentious, intellectually obscure and inordinately long ... a film out of control".[147] The BBC said that its slow pacing often alienates modern audiences more than it did upon its initial release.[148]

Science fiction writers

Science fiction writers had a range of reactions to the film. Ray Bradbury praised the film's photography, but disliked the banality of most of the dialogue, and believed that the audience does not care when Poole dies.[149] Both he and Lester del Rey were put off by the film's feeling of sterility and blandness in all the human encounters amidst all the technological wonders, while both praised the pictorial element of the film. Del Rey was especially harsh, describing the film as dull, confusing, and boring, predicting "It will probably be a box-office disaster, too, and thus set major science-fiction movie making back another ten years." However, the film was praised by science-fiction novelist Samuel R. Delany who was impressed by how the film undercuts the audience's normal sense of space and orientation in several ways. Like Bradbury, Delany picked up on the banality of the dialogue (in Delany's phrasing the characters are saying nothing meaningful), but Delany regards this as a dramatic strength, a prelude to the rebirth at the conclusion of the film.[150] Without analyzing the film in detail, Isaac Asimov spoke well of Space Odyssey in his autobiography, and other essays. The film won the Hugo Award for best dramatic presentation, an award heavily voted on by science fiction fans and published science-fiction writers.[151] James P. Hogan liked the film but complained about the ending that didn't make any sense to him, leading to a bet about whether he could write something better or not; "I stole Arthur's plot idea shamelessly and produced Inherit the Stars."[152]

Influence

Influence on film

"Stanley Kubrick made the ultimate science fiction movie, and it is going to be very hard for someone to come along and make a better movie, as far as I'm concerned. On a technical level, it can be compared, but personally I think that '2001' is far superior."

—George Lucas, 1977[122]

The influence of 2001 on subsequent film-makers is considerable. Steven Spielberg, George Lucas and others, including many special effects technicians, discuss the impact the film has had on them in a featurette entitled Standing on the Shoulders of Kubrick: The Legacy of 2001 included in the 2007 DVD release of the film. Spielberg calls it his film generation's "big bang", while Lucas says it was "hugely inspirational", labeling Kubrick as "the filmmaker's filmmaker". Sydney Pollack refers to it as "groundbreaking", and William Friedkin states 2001 is "the grandfather of all such films". At the 2007 Venice film festival, director Ridley Scott stated he believed 2001 was the unbeatable film that in a sense killed the science fiction genre.[153] Similarly, film critic Michel Ciment in his essay "Odyssey of Stanley Kubrick" stated, "Kubrick has conceived a film which in one stroke has made the whole science fiction cinema obsolete."[154] Others, however, credit 2001 with opening up a market for films such as Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Alien, Blade Runner, and Contact; proving that big-budget "serious" science-fiction films can be commercially successful, and establishing the "sci-fi blockbuster" as a Hollywood staple.[155] Science magazine Discover‍ '​s blogger Stephen Cass, discussing the considerable impact of the film on subsequent science-fiction, writes that "the balletic spacecraft scenes set to sweeping classical music, the tarantula-soft tones of HAL 9000, and the ultimate alien artifact, the Monolith, have all become enduring cultural icons in their own right."[156] Video game director Hideo Kojima has also cited 2001: A Space Odyssey as one of the chief influences for his Metal Gear series, with Solid Snake and Otacon inspired by Dave and Hal.[157]

Influence on media

One commentator has suggested that the image of the Star Child and Earth has contributed to the rise of the "whole earth" icon as a symbol of the unity of humanity. Writing in The Asia Pacific Journal Robert Jacobs traces the history of this icon from early cartoons and drawings of Earth to photographs of Earth from early space missions, to its historic appearance on the cover of The Whole Earth Catalog. Noting that images of the entire planet recur several times in A Space Odyssey, Jacobs writes

the most dramatic use of the icon was in the film's conclusion. In this scene ... Bowman is reborn as the Star Child ... depicted as a fetus floating in space in an amniotic sac. The Star Child turns to consider the Whole Earth floating in front of it, both glowing a bright blue-white. The two appear as newborn versions of Man and Earth, face-to-face, ready to be born into a future of unthinkable possibilities.[158]

Influence on technology and law

A scene where a tablet-style device is portrayed in the film - 2001: A Space Odyssey (film)
A scene where a tablet-style device is portrayed in the film

In August 2011, in response to Apple Inc.'s patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung, the latter argued that Apple's iPad was effectively modeled on the visual tablets that appear aboard spaceship Discovery in the Space Odyssey film, which legally constitute "prior art". Legally, prior art is information that has been disclosed to the public in any form about an invention before a given date that might be relevant to the patent's claim of originality.[159]

"Siri", Apple's natural language voice control system for the iPhone 4S, features a reference to the film: it responds "I'm sorry I can't do that" when asked to "open the pod bay doors".[160]

Inspired by Clarke's visual tablet device, in 1994 a European Commission-funded R&D project code named "NewsPAD" developed and pilot tested a portable 'multimedia viewer' aiming for the realisation of an electronic multimedia 'newspaper' pointing the way to a future fully interactive and highly personalised information source. Involved partners were Acorn RISC Technologies UK, Archimedes GR, Carat FR, Ediciones Primera Plana ES, Instut Catala de Tecnologia ES, and TechMAPP UK.[161]

Accolades and honors

Awards

2001 earned Stanley Kubrick an Academy Award for Best Visual Effects, as well as nominations for Best Director and Original Screenplay (shared with Arthur C. Clarke). Anthony Masters was also nominated for Best Art Direction. An honorary award was made to John Chambers in that year for his make-up work on Planet of the Apes, and Clarke reports that he 'wondered, as loudly as possible, whether the judges had passed over 2001 because they thought we had used real ape-men ...'[162] The film won four Baftas, for Art Direction, Cinematography, Sound Track and as Best Road Show, and was one of nominees in the Best Film category.[163]

The National Board of Review listed 2001 among the Top Ten Films of 1968,[164] and Kansas City Film Critics gave it both the Best Film and Best Director awards.[165] Kubrick earned the Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation,[151] and was nominated for both the Directors Guild of America Award,[166] and the Laurel Award (on which 2001 was named the Best Road Show of 1968).[167] and was up for the Both the Cinema Writers Circle of Spain and the David di Donatello Awards in Italy named 2001 the best foreign production of 1968.[168][169]

Top film lists

2001 was No. 15 on AFI's 2007 100 Years ... 100 Movies, was named No. 40 on its 100 Years, 100 Thrills, was included on its 100 Years, 100 Quotes ("Open the pod bay doors, Hal."), and Hal 9000 is the No. 13 villain in the AFI's 100 Years... 100 Heroes and Villains.[170] 2001 is the only science fiction film to make the Sight & Sound poll for ten best films, and tops the Online Film Critics Society list of "greatest science fiction films of all time."[171] In 1991, this film was deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" by the United States Library of Congress and selected for preservation in the National Film Registry.[172] Other lists that include the film are 50 Films to See Before You Die (#6), The Village Voice 100 Best Films of the 20th century (#11), the Sight & Sound Top Ten poll (#6),[173] and Roger Ebert's Top Ten (1968) (#2). In 1995, the Vatican named it as one of the 45 best films ever made (and included it in a sub-list of the "Top Ten Art Movies" of all time.)[174]

In 2011, the film was the third most screened film in secondary schools in the United Kingdom.[175]

American Film Institute recognition

Interpretation

Since its premiere, 2001: A Space Odyssey has been analyzed and interpreted by professional film critics, amateur writers and science fiction fans, virtually all of whom have mentioned its deliberate ambiguity. Questions about 2001 range from uncertainty about its deeper philosophical implications about humanity's origins and final destiny in the universe,[184] to interpreting elements of the film's more enigmatic scenes such as the meaning of the monolith, or the final fate of astronaut David Bowman. There are also simpler and more mundane questions about what drives the plot, in particular the causes of Hal's breakdown[185] (explained in earlier drafts but kept mysterious in the film).

Stanley Kubrick encouraged people to explore their own interpretations of the film and refused to offer an explanation of "what really happened" in the film, preferring instead to let audiences embrace their own ideas and theories. In a 1968 interview with Playboy magazine, Kubrick stated:

You're free to speculate as you wish about the philosophical and allegorical meaning of the film—and such speculation is one indication that it has succeeded in gripping the audience at a deep level—but I don't want to spell out a verbal road map for 2001 that every viewer will feel obligated to pursue or else fear he's missed the point.[35]

In a subsequent discussion of the film with Joseph Gelmis, Kubrick said his main aim was to avoid "intellectual verbalization" and reach "the viewer's subconscious." However, he said he did not deliberately strive for ambiguity—it was simply an inevitable outcome of making the film nonverbal, though he acknowledged this ambiguity was an invaluable asset to the film. He was willing then to give a fairly straightforward explanation of the plot on what he called the "simplest level," but unwilling to discuss the metaphysical interpretation of the film which he felt should be left up to the individual viewer.[186]

For some readers, Arthur C. Clarke's more straightforward novelization of the script is key to interpreting the film. Clarke's novel explicitly identifies the monolith as a tool created by an alien race that has been through many stages of evolution, moving from organic form to biomechanical, and finally achieving a state of pure energy. These aliens travel the cosmos assisting lesser species to take evolutionary steps. Conversely, film critic Penelope Houston wrote in 1971 that because the novel differs in many key respects from the film, it perhaps should not be regarded as the skeleton key to unlock it.[187]

Multiple allegorical interpretations of 2001 have been proposed, including seeing it as a commentary on Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophical tract Thus Spoke Zarathustra, or as an allegory of human conception, birth and death.[188] The latter can be seen through the final moments of the film, which are defined by the image of the "star child," an in utero fetus that draws on the work of Lennart Nilsson.[189] The star child signifies a "great new beginning,"[189] and is depicted naked and ungirded, but with its eyes wide open.[190] Leonard F. Wheat sees Space Odyssey as a multi-layered allegory, commenting simultaneously on Nietzsche, Homer, and the relationship of man to machine.

The reasons for Hal's malfunction and subsequent malignant behavior have also elicited much discussion. He has been compared to Frankenstein's monster. In Clarke's novel, Hal malfunctions because of being ordered to lie to the crew of Discovery and withhold confidential information from them, despite being constructed for "the accurate processing of information without distortion or concealment". Film critic Roger Ebert wrote that Hal, as the supposedly perfect computer, actually behaves in the most human fashion of all of the characters.[191]

Rolling Stone reviewer Bob McClay sees the film as like a four-movement symphony, its story told with "deliberate realism."[192] Carolyn Geduld believes that what "structurally unites all four episodes of the film" is the monolith, the film's largest and most unresolvable enigma.[193] Vincent LoBrutto's biography of Kubrick says that for many, Clarke's novel is the key to understanding the monolith.[194] Similarly, Geduld observes that "the monolith ... has a very simple explanation in Clarke's novel," though she later asserts that even the novel doesn't fully explain the ending.

McClay's Rolling Stone review describes a parallelism between the monolith's first appearance in which tool usage is imparted to the apes (thus 'beginning' mankind) and the completion of "another evolution" in the fourth and final encounter[195] with the monolith. In a similar vein, Tim Dirks ends his synopsis saying "The cyclical evolution from ape to man to spaceman to angel-starchild-superman is complete."[196]

The first and second encounters of humanity with the monolith have visual elements in common; both apes, and later astronauts, touch the monolith gingerly with their hands, and both sequences conclude with near-identical images of the Sun appearing directly over the monolith (the first with a crescent moon adjacent to it in the sky, the second with a near-identical crescent Earth in the same position), both echoing the Sun–Earth–Moon alignment seen at the very beginning of the film.[197] The second encounter also suggests the triggering of the monolith's radio signal to Jupiter by the presence of humans,[198] echoing the premise of Clarke's source story "The Sentinel".

The monolith is the subject of the film's final line of dialogue (spoken at the end of the "Jupiter Mission" segment): "Its origin and purpose still a total mystery." Reviewers McClay and Roger Ebert wrote that the monolith is the main element of mystery in the film; Ebert described "the shock of the monolith's straight edges and square corners among the weathered rocks," and the apes warily circling it as prefiguring man reaching "for the stars."[199] Patrick Webster suggests the final line relates to how the film should be approached as a whole, noting "The line appends not merely to the discovery of the monolith on the Moon, but to our understanding of the film in the light of the ultimate questions it raises about the mystery of the universe."[200]

The film conveys what some viewers have described as a sense of the sublime and numinous. Roger Ebert writes in his essay on 2001 in The Great Movies:

North's [rejected] score, which is available on a recording, is a good job of film composition, but would have been wrong for 2001 because, like all scores, it attempts to underline the action—to give us emotional cues. The classical music chosen by Kubrick exists outside the action. It uplifts. It wants to be sublime; it brings a seriousness and transcendence to the visuals.[201]

In a book on architecture, Gregory Caicco writes that Space Odyssey illustrates how our quest for space is motivated by two contradictory desires, a "desire for the sublime" characterized by a need to encounter something totally other than ourselves—"something numinous"—and the conflicting desire for a beauty that makes us feel no longer "lost in space," but at home.[202] Similarly, an article in The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy, titled "Sense of Wonder," describes how 2001 creates a "numinous sense of wonder" by portraying a universe that inspires a sense of awe, which at the same time we feel we can understand.[203] Christopher Palmer wrote that there exists in the film a coexistence of "the sublime and the banal," as the film implies that to get into space, mankind had to suspend the "sense of wonder" that motivated him to explore space to begin with.[204]

Sequels and adaptations

Kubrick did not envision a sequel to 2001. Fearing the later exploitation and recycling of his material in other productions (as was done with the props from MGM's Forbidden Planet), he ordered all sets, props, miniatures, production blueprints, and prints of unused scenes destroyed. Most of these materials were lost, with some exceptions: a 2001 spacesuit backpack appeared in the "Close Up" episode of the Gerry Anderson series UFO,[1][47][205][206][207] and one of Hal's eyepieces is in the possession of the author of Hal's Legacy, David G. Stork. In 2012 Lockheed engineer Adam Johnson, working with Frederick I. Ordway III, science adviser to Stanley Kubrick, wrote the book 2001: The Lost Science, which for the first time featured many of the blueprints of the spacecraft and film sets that previously had been thought destroyed.

Clarke wrote three sequel novels: 2010: Odyssey Two (1982), 2061: Odyssey Three (1987), and 3001: The Final Odyssey (1997). The only filmed sequel, 2010, was based on Clarke's 1982 novel and was released in 1984. Kubrick was not involved in the production of this film, which was directed by Peter Hyams in a more conventional style with more dialogue. Clarke saw it as a fitting adaptation of his novel,[208] and had a brief cameo appearance in the film. As Kubrick had ordered all models and blueprints from 2001 destroyed, Hyams was forced to recreate these models from scratch for 2010. Hyams also claimed that he would not make the film had he not received both Kubrick's and Clarke's blessings:

I had a long conversation with Stanley and told him what was going on. If it met with his approval, I would do the film; and if it didn't, I wouldn't. I certainly would not have thought of doing the film if I had not gotten the blessing of Kubrick. He's one of my idols; simply one of the greatest talents that's ever walked the Earth. He more or less said, "Sure. Go do it. I don't care." And another time he said, "Don't be afraid. Just go do your own movie."[209]

The other two novels have not been adapted for the screen, although actor Tom Hanks has expressed interest in possible adaptations of 2061 and 3001.[210]

In 2012, two screenplay adaptations of both 2061 and 3001 were both posted on the 2001:Exhibit website, in the hopes of generating interest in both MGM and Warner Brothers to adapt the last two novels into films.[211]

Beginning in 1976, Marvel Comics published a comic adaptation of the film written and drawn by Jack Kirby, and a 10-issue monthly series expanding on the ideas of the film and novel, also created by Kirby.

Parodies and homages

2001 has been the frequent subject of both parody and homage, sometimes extensively and other times briefly, employing both its distinctive music and iconic imagery.

In advertising and print

  • Mad magazine #125 (March 1969) featured a spoof called 201 Minutes of a Space Idiocy written by Dick DeBartolo and illustrated by Mort Drucker.[212] In the final panels it is revealed that the monolith is a film script titled "How to Make an Incomprehensible Science Fiction Movie" by Stanley Kubrick." It was reprinted in various special issues, in the MAD About the Sixties book, and partially in the book "The Making of Kubrick's 2001".[213]
  • The August 1971 album Who's Next by The Who featured as its cover artwork a photograph of a concrete slab at Easington Colliery with the band apparently doing up their trouser zips. The decision to photograph this "monolith" image while on their way to a concert followed discussion between John Entwistle and Keith Moon about Kubrick's film.[214]
  • Thought to be the first time Kubrick gave permission for his work to be re-used, Apple Inc.'s 1999 website advertisement "It was a bug, Dave" was made using footage from the film. Launched during the era of concerns over Y2K bugs, the ad implied that Hal's weird behavior was caused by a Y2K bug, before driving home the point that "only Macintosh was designed to function perfectly".[215]

In film and television

  • Mel Brooks' satirical film History of the World, Part I opens with a parody of Kubrick's "Dawn of Man" sequence, narrated by Orson Welles. DVDVerdict describes this parody as "spot on".[216] A similar spoof of the "Dawn of Man" sequence also opened Ken Shapiro's 1974 comedy The Groove Tube in which the monolith was replaced by a television set. (The film is mostly a parody of television. Film and Filming[217] held that after this wonderful opening, the film slid downhill.)
  • Woody Allen cast actor Douglas Rain (Hal in Kubrick's film) in an uncredited part as the voice of the controlling computer in the closing sequences of his science-fiction comedy Sleeper.[218]
  • Matt Groening's animated series The Simpsons, of which Kubrick was a fan, [219] and Futurama frequently reference 2001, along with other Kubrick films. The Simpsons had in the episode "Deep Space Homer" Bart throwing a felt-tip marker into the air; in slow motion it rotates, before a match cut replaces it with a cylindrical satellite. In 2004 Empire magazine listed this as the third best film parody of the entire run of the show.[220] In the Futurama episode "Love and Rocket" a sentient spaceship revolts in a manner similar to Hal. Games Radar listed this as number 17 in its list of 20 Funniest Futurama parodies, while noting that Futurama has referenced Space Odyssey on several other occasions.[221]
  • In the 2000 South Park episode "Trapper Keeper", an interaction between Eric Cartman and Kyle Broflovski parodies the conversation between Hal and Bowman within the inner core.[222]
  • Peter Sellers starred in Hal Ashby's comedy-drama Being There about a simple-minded middle-aged gardener who has lived his entire life in the townhouse of his wealthy employer. In the scene where he first leaves the house and ventures into the wide world for the first time, the soundtrack plays a jazzy version of Strauss' Thus Spake Zarathustra arranged by Eumir Deodato. Film critic James A. Davidson writing for the film journal Images suggests "When Chance emerges from his home into the world, Ashby suggests his child-like nature by using Richard Strauss' Thus Spake Zarathustra as ironic background music, linking his hero with Kubrick's star baby in his masterpiece 2001: A Space Odyssey."[223]
  • Tim Burton's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory has a scene (using actual footage from A Space Odyssey) in which the monolith morphs into a chocolate bar.[224] Catholic News wrote that the film "had subtle and obvious riffs on everything from the saccharine Disney "Small World" exhibit to Munchkinland to, most brilliantly, a hilarious takeoff on Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey."[225]
  • Andrew Stanton, the director of WALL-E, revealed in an interview with Wired magazine that his film was in many ways his homage to Space Odyssey, Alien, Blade Runner, Close Encounters and several other science-fiction films.[226] The reviewer for USA Today described the resemblance of the spaceship's computer, Auto, to Hal.[227] The same year saw the release of the much less successful film Eagle Eye, about which The Charlotte Observer said that, like 2001, it featured a "red-eyed, calm-voiced supercomputer that took human life to protect what it felt were higher objectives"[228]
  • Commenting on the broader use of Ligeti's music beyond that by Kubrick, London Magazine in 2006 mentioned Monty Python's use of Ligeti in a 60-second spoof of Space Odyssey in the Flying Circus episode commonly labeled "A Book at Bedtime".[229]
  • The poorly reviewed Canadian spoof 2001: A Space Travesty has been occasionally alluded to as a full parody of Kubrick's film,[230] both because of its title and star Leslie Nielsen's many previous films which were full parodies of other films.[231] However, Space Travesty only makes occasional references to Kubrick's material, its "celebrities are really aliens" jokes resembling those in Men in Black.[232] Canadian reviewer Jim Slotek said, "It's not really a spoof of 2001, or anything in particular. There's a brief homage at the start, and one scene in a shuttle en route to the Moon that uses The Blue Danube... The rest is a patched together plot."[233] Among many complaints about the film, reviewer Berge Garabedian derided the lack of much substantive connection to the Kubrick film (the latter of which he said was "funnier").[234]
  • Among spoof references to several science-fiction films and shows,[235] Airplane II features a computer called ROK 9000 in control of a Moon shuttle which malfunctions and kills crew members, which several reviewers found reminiscent of Hal.[236][237][238]
  • Mystery Science Theater 3000 had the design of its main setting, the starship Satellite of Love, based on the bone-shaped satellite featured in the match cut from prehistoria to the future.[239] The one-eyed design of the robot Gypsy lead the show to do various scenes comparing it to HAL 9000,[240] including a scene the 1996 feature film, where the opening featuring Mike Nelson jogging along the walls of the Satellite of Love parodies the scene where Frank Poole does the same in the Discovery.[241]

In software and video games

  • 2001: A Space Odyssey has also been referenced in multiple video games, usually with reference to either the monolith or Hal.
  • In SimEarth, monoliths are used to encourage the evolution of species.

Several black monoliths can be found in EVE Online, marked by a beacon with name "Black monolith". Their purpose in game is unknown. The objects are described in-game as "It's full of stars", which is reference to the film's sequel, 2010: The Year We Make Contact.[242][243][244][245]

See also

References

The Making of Kubrick's 2001
(1970)
Legendary film notes.
2001: Filming the Future (Revised)
Piers Bizony (2000)
First published in 1994, Piers Bizony's book has become the classic account of the making of Stanley Kubrick's seminal movie, 2001: A Space Odyssey. Hailed by Tom Hanks (in an unsolicited tribute) as "without question the best collection of not just information regarding the film, but also a chronicle of its inspiration", it has become the benchmark of writing about this cult movie.Piers Bizony interviewed many members of the team who created 2001, including Arthur C. Clarke, who co-wrote the screenplay (with Stanley Kubrick), The special effects supervisor, technical advisors, production designers, model-makers, effects technicians, and contractors. 2001: Filming the Future gives a fascinating view of the making of one of the most obsessively detailed productions ever. Now, on the eve of 2001, midnight on December 31, 2000, Warner Bros. will release worldwide a new print of 2001: A Space Odyssey.Filled with new material that came to light after first publication, the book includes interviews with actors Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood, interviews with other actors, new material from effects supervisor Doug Trumbull, and additional illustrations to include newly discovered photographs of the main "Discovery" space model. Kubrick's career as a whole is summarized, with some notes about the last 10 years of his life. Sources and references are updated and relevant approved websites are listed to make this the ultimate sourcebook on 2001.
The Stanley Kubrick Archives
Alison Castle (2005)
The first book to explore Stanley Kubrick's archives is also the most comprehensive study of the filmmaker to date Part 1: The films In 1968, when Stanley Kubrick was asked to comment on the metaphysical significance of 2001: A Space Odyssey, he replied: ?It's not a message I ever intended to convey in words. 2001 is a nonverbal experience?. I tried to create a visual experience, one that bypasses verbalized pigeonholing and directly penetrates the subconscious with an emotional and philosophic content.? The philosophy behind Part I borrows from this line of thinking: from the opening sequence of Killer's Kiss to the final frames of Eyes Wide Shut, Kubrick's complete films will be presented chronologically and wordlessly via frame enlargements. A completely nonverbal experience. Part 2: The Creative Process Divided into chapters chronologically by film, Part 2 brings to life the creative process of Kubrick's filmmaking by presenting a remarkable collection of material from his archives, including photographs, props, posters, artwork, set designs, sketches, correspondence, documents, screenplays, drafts, notes, and shooting schedules. Accompanying the visual material are essays by noted Kubrick scholars, articles written by and about Kubrick, and a selection of Kubrick's best interviews. Special features ? Part 1 features 800 film stills scanned directly from the original prints and interpositives ? Part 2 presents about 800 items from the archives, most of which have never been published before ? essays by Kubrick scholars Gene D. Phillips, Michel Ciment, and Rodney Hill ? selected articles and essays, including interviews with and essays by Stanley Kubrick ? illustrated Kubrickchronology ? audio CD featuring a 70-minute 1966 interview of Stanley Kubrick by Jeremy Bernstein **BONUS** ? books in the first print run will each include a twelve-frame film strip from a 70mm print of 2001: A Space Odyssey owned by Stanley Kubrick Made in cooperation with Jan Harlan, Christiane Kubrick, and the Stanley Kubrick Estate. The editor: Alison Castle received a BA in philosophy from Columbia University and an MA in photography and film from New York University (NYU/International Center of Photography masters program). Castle also edited TASCHEN's Some Like it Hot. She lives in Paris, home of the world's best cinemas.
Kubrick: The Definitive Edition
Michel Ciment:::Gilbert Adair:::Martin Scorsese (2003)
With a new Introduction by Martin Scorsese.If Stanley Kubrick had made only 2001: A Space Odyssey or Dr. Strangelove, his cinematic legacy would have been assured. But from his first feature film, Fear and Desire, to the posthumously released Eyes Wide Shut, Kubrick created an accomplished body of work unique in its scope, diversity, and artistry, and by turns both lauded and controversial.In this newly revised and definitive edition of his now classic study, film critic Michel Ciment provides an insightful examination of Kubrick's thirteen films--including such favorites as Lolita, A Clockwork Orange, and Full Metal Jacket--alongside an assemblage of more than four hundred photographs that form a complementary photo essay. Rounding out this unique work are a short biography of Kubrick; interviews with the director, as well as cast and crew members, including Malcolm McDowell, Shelley Duvall, and Jack Nicholson; and a detailed filmography and bibliography. Meshed with masterful integrity, the book's text and illustrations pay homage to one of the most visionary, original, and demanding filmmakers of our time.
The Lost Worlds of 2001
Arthur C. Clarke (1972)
The Complete Kubrick
David Hughes (2001)
With just thirteen feature films in half a century, Stanley Kubrick established himself as one of the most accomplished directors in motion picture history. Kubrick created a landmark and a benchmark with every film; working in almost every genre imaginable, including film noir, war movie, SF, horror, period drama, historical epic, love story and satire - yet transcended traditional genre boundaries with every shot. Examining every feature film, from the early shorts through to classics such as Paths of Glory, Dr Strangelove, 2001: A Space Odyssey, A Clockwork Orange, The Shining, Full Metal Jacket and finally, Eyes Wide Shut, The Complete Kubrick provides a unique insight into understanding the work of cinema's most enigmatic, iconoclastic and gifted auteur.
Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey: New Essays
(2006)
Almost all students have seen 2001, but virtually none understand its inheritance, its complexities, and certainly not its ironies. The essays in this collection, commissioned from a wide variety of scholars, examine in detail various possible readings of the film and its historical context. They also examine the film as a genre piece--as the summa of science fiction that simultaneously looks back on the science fiction conventions of the past (Kubrick began thinking of making a science fiction film during the genre's heyday in the fifties), rethinks the convention in light of the time of the film's creation, and in turn changes the look and meaning of the genre that it revived--which now remains as prominent as it was almost four decades ago. Constructed out of its director's particular intellectual curiosity, his visual style, and his particular notions of the place of human agency in the world and, in this case, the universe, 2001 is, like all of his films, more than it appears, and it keeps revealing more the more it is seen. Though their backgrounds and disciplines differ, the authors of this essay collection are united by a talent for vigorous yet incisive writing that cleaves closely to the text--to the film itself, with its contextual and intrinsic complexities--granting readers privileged access to Kubrick's formidable, intricate classic work of science fiction.
The Making of 2001: A Space Odyssey (Modern Library Movies)
(2000)
"If 2001 has stirred your emotions, your subconscious, your mythological yearnings, then it has succeeded."--Stanley KubrickStanley Kubrick's extraordinary movie 2001: A Space Odyssey was released in 1969. The critics initially disliked it, but the public loved it. And eventually, the film took its rightful place as one of the most innovative, brilliant, and pivotal works of modern cinema. The Making of 2001: A Space Odyssey consists of testimony from Kubrick's collaborators and commentary from critics and historians. This is the most complete book on the film to date--from Stanley Kubrick's first meeting with screenwriter Arthur C. Clarke to Kubrick's exhaustive research to the actual shooting and release of the movie.
Stanley Kubrick, Director: A Visual Analysis
Ulrich Ruchti:::Sybil Taylor:::Alexander Walker (2000)
Alexander Walker's Stanley Kubrick, Director is the only book ever written with Kubrick's cooperation.This new edition, revised and expanded to discuss all of Kubrick's films—including Eyes Wide Shut—again received the approval of the reclusive director, who before his death allowed the use of illustrations taken directly from his films' frames. The result is a frame-by-frame examination of the inimitable style that infuses every Kubrick movie, from the pitch-perfect hilarity of Lolita to the icy supremacy of 2001: A Space Odyssey to the baroque horror of The Shining. The book's beautiful design and dynamic arrangement of photographic stills offer a frame-by-frame understanding of how Kubrick constructed a film. What emerges is a deeply human study of one remarkable artist's nature and obsessions, and how these changed and shifted in his four decades as a filmmaker. Black-and-white illustrations throughout, 8 pages of color.
  • Agel, Jerome, ed. (1970). The Making of Kubrick's 2001. New York: New American Library. ISBN 0-451-07139-5. 
  • Bizony, Piers (2001). 2001 Filming the Future. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. ISBN 1-85410-706-2. 
  • Castle, Alison (ed.), ed. (2005). "Part 2: The Creative Process / 2001: A Space Odyssey". The Stanley Kubrick Archives. New York: Taschen. ISBN 3-8228-2284-1. 
  • Ciment, Michel (1999) [1980]. Kubrick. New York: Faber and Faber. ISBN 0-571-21108-9. 
  • Clarke, Arthur C. (1972). The Lost Worlds of 2001. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. ISBN 0-283-97903-8. 
  • Emme, Eugene M., ed. (1982). Science fiction and space futures – past and present. AAS History Series, Volume 5. San Diego: Univelt. ISBN 0-87703-172-X. 
  • Fiell, Charlotte (2005). 1,000 Chairs (Taschen 25). Taschen. ISBN 978-3-8228-4103-7. 
  • Gelmis, Joseph (1970). The Film Director As Superstar. New York: Doubleday & Company. 
  • Hughes, David (2000). The Complete Kubrick. London: Virgin Publishing Ltd. ISBN 0-7535-0452-9. 
  • Johnson, Adam (2012). 2001 The Lost Science. Burlington Canada: Apogee Prime. ISBN 978-1-926837-19-2. 
  • Kolker, Robert, ed. (2006). Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey: New Essays. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-517453-4. 
  • Pina, Leslie A. (2002). Herman Miller Office. Pennsylvania, USA: Schiffer Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7643-1650-0. 
  • Richter, Daniel (2002). Moonwatcher's Memoir: A Diary of 2001: A Space Odyssey. foreword by Arthur C. Clarke. New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers. ISBN 0-7867-1073-X. 
  • Schwam, Stephanie, ed. (2000). The Making of 2001: A Space Odyssey. introduction by Jay Cocks. New York: Modern Library. ISBN 0-375-75528-4. 
  • Shuldiner, Herbert (1968) How They Filmed '2001: A Space Odyssey', Bonnier Corporation: Popular Science, June 1968, pp. 62–67, Vol. 192, No. 6, ISSN 0161-7370
  • Walker, Alexander (2000). Stanley Kubrick, Director. New York: W.W. Norton and Company. ISBN 0-393-32119-3. 
  • Wheat, Leonard F. (2000). Kubrick's 2001: A Triple Allegory. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 0-8108-3796-X. 

Citations

The Lost Worlds of 2001
Arthur C. Clarke (1972)
Stanley Kubrick
Vincent LoBrutto (1998)
When Stanley Kubrick first sold a photograph, at the age of 17, he had already begun telling stories through pictures. Without any formal education in film-making, he taught himself to make films through photography and by spending many hours in his local cinema. At 21 he financed and created his own short film, "Day of the Fight", thus beginning a controversial cinema career that has incorporated films such as "Dr Strangelove", "A Clockwork Orange" and "2001: A Space Odyssey". This detailed biography of Kubrick includes interviews with people who knew him during his formative years, as well as accounts by professional colleagues.
Carl Sagan's Cosmic Connection: An Extraterrestrial Perspective
Carl Sagan (2000)
In 1973, Carl Sagan published The Cosmic Connection, a daring view of the universe, which rapidly became a classic work of popular science and inspired a generation of scientists and enthusiasts. This seminal work is reproduced here for a whole new generation to enjoy. In Sagan's typically lucid and lyrical style, he discusses many topics from astrophysics and solar system science, to colonization, terraforming and the search for extraterrestrials. Sagan conveys his own excitement and wonder, and relates the revelations of astronomy to the most profound human problems and concerns: issues that are just as valid today as they were thirty years ago. New to this edition are Freeman Dyson's comments on Sagan's vision and the importance of the work, Ann Druyan's assessment of Sagan's cultural significance as a champion of science, and David Morrison's discussion of the advances made since 1973 and what became of Sagan's predictions. Who knows what wonders this third millennium will reveal, but one thing is certain: Carl Sagan played a unique role in preparing us for them.
2001: Filming the Future (Revised)
Piers Bizony (2000)
First published in 1994, Piers Bizony's book has become the classic account of the making of Stanley Kubrick's seminal movie, 2001: A Space Odyssey. Hailed by Tom Hanks (in an unsolicited tribute) as "without question the best collection of not just information regarding the film, but also a chronicle of its inspiration", it has become the benchmark of writing about this cult movie.Piers Bizony interviewed many members of the team who created 2001, including Arthur C. Clarke, who co-wrote the screenplay (with Stanley Kubrick), The special effects supervisor, technical advisors, production designers, model-makers, effects technicians, and contractors. 2001: Filming the Future gives a fascinating view of the making of one of the most obsessively detailed productions ever. Now, on the eve of 2001, midnight on December 31, 2000, Warner Bros. will release worldwide a new print of 2001: A Space Odyssey.Filled with new material that came to light after first publication, the book includes interviews with actors Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood, interviews with other actors, new material from effects supervisor Doug Trumbull, and additional illustrations to include newly discovered photographs of the main "Discovery" space model. Kubrick's career as a whole is summarized, with some notes about the last 10 years of his life. Sources and references are updated and relevant approved websites are listed to make this the ultimate sourcebook on 2001.
Stanley Kubrick
Vincent LoBrutto (1998)
When Stanley Kubrick first sold a photograph, at the age of 17, he had already begun telling stories through pictures. Without any formal education in film-making, he taught himself to make films through photography and by spending many hours in his local cinema. At 21 he financed and created his own short film, "Day of the Fight", thus beginning a controversial cinema career that has incorporated films such as "Dr Strangelove", "A Clockwork Orange" and "2001: A Space Odyssey". This detailed biography of Kubrick includes interviews with people who knew him during his formative years, as well as accounts by professional colleagues.
Kubrick's Cinema Odyssey:
Michel Chion (2001)
In this multilayered study, Michel Chion offers some keys to understanding Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey". Setting the film in its historical and cultural contexts, Chion goes on to locate it within Kubrick's career.
Die Rhetorik der Filmsynchronisation: Wie auslandische Spielfilme in Deutschland zensiert, verandert und gesehen werden (Medienbibliothek) (German Edition)
Guido Marc Pruys (1997)
The Lost Worlds of 2001
Arthur c. Clarke (1972)
Science fiction.
The Making of 2001: A Space Odyssey (Modern Library Movies)
(2000)
"If 2001 has stirred your emotions, your subconscious, your mythological yearnings, then it has succeeded."--Stanley KubrickStanley Kubrick's extraordinary movie 2001: A Space Odyssey was released in 1969. The critics initially disliked it, but the public loved it. And eventually, the film took its rightful place as one of the most innovative, brilliant, and pivotal works of modern cinema. The Making of 2001: A Space Odyssey consists of testimony from Kubrick's collaborators and commentary from critics and historians. This is the most complete book on the film to date--from Stanley Kubrick's first meeting with screenwriter Arthur C. Clarke to Kubrick's exhaustive research to the actual shooting and release of the movie.
The Making of 2001: A Space Odyssey (Modern Library Movies)
(2000)
"If 2001 has stirred your emotions, your subconscious, your mythological yearnings, then it has succeeded."--Stanley KubrickStanley Kubrick's extraordinary movie 2001: A Space Odyssey was released in 1969. The critics initially disliked it, but the public loved it. And eventually, the film took its rightful place as one of the most innovative, brilliant, and pivotal works of modern cinema. The Making of 2001: A Space Odyssey consists of testimony from Kubrick's collaborators and commentary from critics and historians. This is the most complete book on the film to date--from Stanley Kubrick's first meeting with screenwriter Arthur C. Clarke to Kubrick's exhaustive research to the actual shooting and release of the movie.
The Stanley Kubrick Archives
Alison Castle (2005)
The first book to explore Stanley Kubrick's archives is also the most comprehensive study of the filmmaker to date Part 1: The films In 1968, when Stanley Kubrick was asked to comment on the metaphysical significance of 2001: A Space Odyssey, he replied: ?It's not a message I ever intended to convey in words. 2001 is a nonverbal experience?. I tried to create a visual experience, one that bypasses verbalized pigeonholing and directly penetrates the subconscious with an emotional and philosophic content.? The philosophy behind Part I borrows from this line of thinking: from the opening sequence of Killer's Kiss to the final frames of Eyes Wide Shut, Kubrick's complete films will be presented chronologically and wordlessly via frame enlargements. A completely nonverbal experience. Part 2: The Creative Process Divided into chapters chronologically by film, Part 2 brings to life the creative process of Kubrick's filmmaking by presenting a remarkable collection of material from his archives, including photographs, props, posters, artwork, set designs, sketches, correspondence, documents, screenplays, drafts, notes, and shooting schedules. Accompanying the visual material are essays by noted Kubrick scholars, articles written by and about Kubrick, and a selection of Kubrick's best interviews. Special features ? Part 1 features 800 film stills scanned directly from the original prints and interpositives ? Part 2 presents about 800 items from the archives, most of which have never been published before ? essays by Kubrick scholars Gene D. Phillips, Michel Ciment, and Rodney Hill ? selected articles and essays, including interviews with and essays by Stanley Kubrick ? illustrated Kubrickchronology ? audio CD featuring a 70-minute 1966 interview of Stanley Kubrick by Jeremy Bernstein **BONUS** ? books in the first print run will each include a twelve-frame film strip from a 70mm print of 2001: A Space Odyssey owned by Stanley Kubrick Made in cooperation with Jan Harlan, Christiane Kubrick, and the Stanley Kubrick Estate. The editor: Alison Castle received a BA in philosophy from Columbia University and an MA in photography and film from New York University (NYU/International Center of Photography masters program). Castle also edited TASCHEN's Some Like it Hot. She lives in Paris, home of the world's best cinemas.
The Stanley Kubrick Archives
Alison Castle (2005)
The first book to explore Stanley Kubrick's archives is also the most comprehensive study of the filmmaker to date Part 1: The films In 1968, when Stanley Kubrick was asked to comment on the metaphysical significance of 2001: A Space Odyssey, he replied: ?It's not a message I ever intended to convey in words. 2001 is a nonverbal experience?. I tried to create a visual experience, one that bypasses verbalized pigeonholing and directly penetrates the subconscious with an emotional and philosophic content.? The philosophy behind Part I borrows from this line of thinking: from the opening sequence of Killer's Kiss to the final frames of Eyes Wide Shut, Kubrick's complete films will be presented chronologically and wordlessly via frame enlargements. A completely nonverbal experience. Part 2: The Creative Process Divided into chapters chronologically by film, Part 2 brings to life the creative process of Kubrick's filmmaking by presenting a remarkable collection of material from his archives, including photographs, props, posters, artwork, set designs, sketches, correspondence, documents, screenplays, drafts, notes, and shooting schedules. Accompanying the visual material are essays by noted Kubrick scholars, articles written by and about Kubrick, and a selection of Kubrick's best interviews. Special features ? Part 1 features 800 film stills scanned directly from the original prints and interpositives ? Part 2 presents about 800 items from the archives, most of which have never been published before ? essays by Kubrick scholars Gene D. Phillips, Michel Ciment, and Rodney Hill ? selected articles and essays, including interviews with and essays by Stanley Kubrick ? illustrated Kubrickchronology ? audio CD featuring a 70-minute 1966 interview of Stanley Kubrick by Jeremy Bernstein **BONUS** ? books in the first print run will each include a twelve-frame film strip from a 70mm print of 2001: A Space Odyssey owned by Stanley Kubrick Made in cooperation with Jan Harlan, Christiane Kubrick, and the Stanley Kubrick Estate. The editor: Alison Castle received a BA in philosophy from Columbia University and an MA in photography and film from New York University (NYU/International Center of Photography masters program). Castle also edited TASCHEN's Some Like it Hot. She lives in Paris, home of the world's best cinemas.
DISTURBING THE UNIVERSE
FREEMAN DYSON (1981)
The Making of Kubrick's 2001
(1970)
Legendary film notes.
The Making of Kubrick's 2001
(1970)
Legendary film notes.
The Making of Kubrick's 2001
(1970)
Legendary film notes.
The Making of Kubrick's 2001
(1970)
Legendary film notes.
The Making of Kubrick's 2001
(1970)
Legendary film notes.
The Making of Kubrick's 2001
(1970)
Legendary film notes.
The Making of Kubrick's 2001
(1970)
Legendary film notes.
The Making of Kubrick's 2001
(1970)
Legendary film notes.
The Making of Kubrick's 2001
(1970)
Legendary film notes.
  1. ^ a b c Agel 1970, p. 169.
  2. ^ a b c Agel 1970, p. 170.
  3. ^ a b "2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)". British Film Institute. Retrieved June 21, 2014. 
  4. ^ Miller, Frank. "Behind the Camera on 2001: A Space Odyssey". Turner Classic Movies. Retrieved December 24, 2014. 
  5. ^ a b "2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved March 20, 2012. 
  6. ^ Kolker 2006, p. 16.
  7. ^ a b c Miller, Frank. "The Critics' Corner on 2001: A Space Odyssey". Turner Classic Movies. Retrieved December 24, 2014. 
  8. ^ a b James Chapman; Nicholas J. Cull (5 February 2013). Projecting Tomorrow: Science Fiction and Popular Cinema. I.B.Tauris. pp. 97–. ISBN 978-1-78076-410-8. 
  9. ^ McAleer, Neil (1 April 2013). Sir Arthur C. Clarke: Odyssey of a Visionary: A Biography. RosettaBooks. pp. 140–. ISBN 978-0-9848118-0-9. 
  10. ^ "National Film Registry". National Film Registry (National Film Preservation Board, Library of Congress). Retrieved November 26, 2011. 
  11. ^ "Sight and Sound: Top Ten Poll 2002". British Film Institute. Archived from the original on December 16, 2006. Retrieved December 15, 2006. 
  12. ^ "Vertigo is named 'greatest film of all time'". BBC News. August 2, 2012. Retrieved August 24, 2012. 
  13. ^ "The Moving Arts Film Journal | TMA's 100 Greatest Films of All Time | web site". Archived from the original on January 6, 2011. Retrieved February 3, 2011. 
  14. ^ Kubrick, in a 1970 interview with Joseph Gelmis, refers to this as a "Star-Gate" (Gelmis 1970, p. 304).
  15. ^ Kubrick, in a 1970 interview with Joseph Gelmis, refers to this as a "Star-Child" (Gelmis 1970, p. 304).
  16. ^ "The Underview on 2001: A Space Odyssey - Cast and Crew". Retrieved September 30, 2013. 
  17. ^ Agel 1970, p. 11.
  18. ^ Clarke, Arthur C. (1972). The Lost Worlds of 2001. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. p. 17. ISBN 0-283-97903-8. 
  19. ^ LoBrutto, Vincent (1998) [1997]. Stanley Kubrick. London: Faber and Faber. pp. 156–257. ISBN 0-571-19393-5. 
  20. ^ Sir Arthur C. Clarke: Odyssey of a Visionary. RosettaBooks. 
  21. ^ a b Clarke 1972, p. 29.
  22. ^ Clarke 1972, pp. 32–35.
  23. ^ Agel 1970, p. 61.
  24. ^ Clarke, Arthur C. (2001). Collected Stories of Arthur C. Clarke. Macmillan. p. 460. ISBN 978-0-312-87821-4. 
  25. ^ Hughes 2000, p. 135
  26. ^ Clarke 1972, p. 32
  27. ^ Agel 1970, p. 25
  28. ^ Agel 1970, pp. 24–25.
  29. ^ a b c Gelmis 1970, p. 308.
  30. ^ a b c Clarke 1972, pp. 31–38.
  31. ^ a b "What did Kubrick have to say about what 2001 "means"?". Krusch.com. Archived from the original on September 27, 2010. Retrieved August 22, 2010. 
  32. ^ Gelmis 1970, p. 302.
  33. ^ "2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) - FAQ". IMDb. 
  34. ^ Sagan, Carl (2000). "25". Carl Sagan's cosmic connection: an extraterrestrial perspective (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 183. ISBN 0-521-78303-8. Retrieved January 27, 2012. 
  35. ^ a b "Stanley Kubrick: Playboy Interview". Playboy Magazine (September). 1968. Archived from the original on September 25, 2010. Retrieved September 2, 2010. 
  36. ^ a b Agel 1970,[page needed].
  37. ^ Jason Sperb's study of Kubrick The Kubrick Facade analyzes Kubrick's use of narration in detail. John Baxter's biography of Kubrick also describes how he frequently favored voice-over narration. Only 3 of Kubrick's 13 films lack narration- Space Odyssey, The Shining, and Eyes Wide Shut
  38. ^ a b "The Kubrick Site: Fred Ordway on "2001"". Visual-memory.co.uk. Retrieved August 22, 2010. 
  39. ^ Clarke 1972,[page needed].
  40. ^ a b Clarke, Arthur (1968). 2001: A Space Odyssey. UK: New American Library. ISBN 0-453-00269-2. 
  41. ^ See Arthur C. Clarke's forward to 2010: Odyssey Two
  42. ^ Agel 1970, p. 328–329.
  43. ^ Stanley Kubrick: A Biography by Vincent LoBrutto p. 310.
  44. ^ Gelmis, J. "An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969)". Retrieved August 31, 2010. 
  45. ^ See Alexander Walker's book Stanley Kubrick, Director p. 181–182. This is the 2000 edition. The 1971 edition is titled "Stanley Kubrick Directs"
  46. ^ Walker 2000, p. 192.
  47. ^ a b Bizony, Piers (2001). 2001 Filming the Future. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. ISBN 1-85410-706-2. 
  48. ^ Walker 2000, pp. 181–182.
  49. ^ "The Kubrick Site: Slavoj Zizek on Eyes Wide Shut". visual-memory.co.uk. 
  50. ^ Michael Lennick (January 7, 2001). 2001 and Beyond (television). Canada: Discovery Channel Canada. 
  51. ^ "See Ebert's review at". Rogerebert.suntimes.com. March 27, 1997. Retrieved August 22, 2010. 
  52. ^ See Walker, Alexander. Stanley Kubrick Directs. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971 p. 251
  53. ^ a b "Roger Ebert, Reviews: 2001: A Space Odyssey, 1968. Retrieved from". Rogerebert.suntimes.com. April 12, 1968. Retrieved August 22, 2010. 
  54. ^ a b Gedult, Carolyn. The Production: A Calendar. Reproduced in: Castle, Alison (Editor). The Stanley Kubrick Archives, Taschen, 2005. ISBN 3-8228-2284-1
  55. ^ Schwam 2000, p. 58.
  56. ^ Schwam 2000, p. 5
  57. ^ Lightman, Herb A. Filming 2001: A Space Odyssey. American Cinematographer, June 1968. Excerpted in: Castle, Alison (Editor). The Stanley Kubrick Archives, Taschen, 2005. ISBN 3-8228-2284-1
  58. ^ a b Richter 2002,[page needed]
  59. ^ Clarke 1972, p. 51.
  60. ^ Richter 2002, p. 135.
  61. ^ Schwam 2001, p. 117.
  62. ^ Kimble, Greg. "THIS IS CINERAMA!". In70mm.com. 
  63. ^ "Road to the Stars". Candle Light Stories.com. Retrieved November 24, 2011. 
  64. ^ "Road to the Stars – 1957 Soviet Space Vision with Stunning Special Effects". Candlelight Stories. January 19, 2011. Retrieved November 24, 2011. 
  65. ^ "Klushantsev: Russia's Wizard of Fantastika". American cinematographer (ASC Holding Corp) 75. 1994. 
  66. ^ Bizony 2001, p. 159.
  67. ^ Examples of the Action Office desk and "Propst Perch" chair appearing in the film can be seen in "Herman Miller Office" (2002) by Leslie Pina on p. 66–71
  68. ^ David Franz, "The Moral Life of Cubicles," The New Atlantis, Number 19, Winter 2008, pp. 132–139
  69. ^ Cubicles had earlier appeared in Jacques Tati's Playtime in 1967
  70. ^ "2001: A Flatware Odyssey". io9. January 15, 2008. Retrieved February 25, 2011. 
  71. ^ Friedman, Bradley (February 27, 2008). "2001: A Space Odyssey – Modern Chairs & Products by Arne Jacobsen Bows at Gibraltar Furniture". Free-Press-Release.com. Retrieved February 25, 2011. 
  72. ^ "2001: A Space Odyssey-Products by Arne Jacobsen". Designosophy. October 4, 2007. Retrieved February 25, 2011. 
  73. ^ Patton, Phil (February 19, 1998). "Public Eye; 30 Years After '2001': A Furniture Odyssey". New York Times. Retrieved February 26, 2011. 
  74. ^ Fiell, Charlotte and Peter (2005). 1000 Chairs (Taschen 25). Taschen. ISBN 3-8228-4103-X. 
  75. ^ "Olivier Mourgue, Designer: (born 1939 in Paris, France)". Olivier Mourgue. Retrieved February 25, 2011. 
  76. ^ Article by Walker in Schwam Making of 2001:A Space Odyssey
  77. ^ At least some of the space station is occupied by Hilton hotel. The conversation with the Russian scientists takes place near their front desk.
  78. ^ Walker, Stanley Kubrick Directs, p. 224.
  79. ^ Between the two lines large red letters reading at top "CAUTION" and at bottom "EXPLOSIVE BOLTS" are smaller black lines reading "MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT INSTRUCTIONS" followed by even smaller lines of four instructions beginning "(1) SELF TEST EXPLOSIVE BOLTS PER INST 14 PARA 3 SEC 5D AFTER EACH EVA", et cetera. The instructions are generally legible on Blu-ray editions but not DVD editions of the film.
  80. ^ Addey, Dave (2014-02-11). "2001: A Space Odyssey: Typeset in the Future". Retrieved 2014-02-23. 
  81. ^ Bizony 2001, p. 133.
  82. ^ a b Lightman, Herb A. "Front Projection for "2001: A Space Odyssey"". American Cinematographer. Retrieved September 20, 2012. 
  83. ^ Bizony 2001, pp. 113–117.
  84. ^ George D. DeMet, The Special Effects of "2001: A Space Odyssey", DFX, July 1999
  85. ^ Bizony 2001, pp. 138–144.
  86. ^ Bizony 2001, p. 144.
  87. ^ Agel 1970, pp. 129–135.
  88. ^ Jan Harlan, Stanley Kubrick (October 2007). 2001:A Space Odyssey (DVD). Warner Bros. 
  89. ^ Agel 1970, pp. 143–146.
  90. ^ Agel 1970, p. 150.
  91. ^ Douglas Trumbull (June 1968). "Creating Special Effects for 2001". American Cinematographer 49 (6): 412–413, 420–422, 416–419, 441–447, 451–454, 459–461. 
  92. ^ "New Titles – The Stanley Kubrick Archives – Facts". Archived from the original on January 1, 2007. Retrieved February 5, 2007. 
  93. ^ Time Warp – CD Booklet – Telarc Release# CD-80106
  94. ^ LoBrutto, Vincent (1998). Stanley Kubrick. London: Faber and Faber. p. 308. ISBN 0-571-19393-5. 
  95. ^ Cinefantastique, Volume 24, Issues 6-26 p. 41
  96. ^ "Recording Engineer - Eric Tomlinson" (PDF). Chris Malone. Retrieved 2014-10-21. 
  97. ^ "1968 : La révolution Kubrick". Cinezik web site (French film magazine on music in film) (in French). Archived from the original on October 23, 2009. Retrieved September 29, 2009. 
  98. ^ (Usually translated as "Thus Spake Zarathustra" or occasionally "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" - The book by Nietzsche has been translated both ways and the title of Strauss's music is usually rendered in the original German whenever not discussed in the context of 2001. Although Britannica Online's entry lists the piece as spoke Zarathustra, music encyclopedias usually go with 'spake'. Overall, 'spake' is more common mentioning the Strauss music and 'spoke' more common mentioning the book by Nietzsche. - the soundtrack album gives the former, the movie's credits give the latter).
  99. ^ Donald MacGregor. "2001; or, How One Film-Reviews With a Hammer". Visual-Memory. Retrieved September 29, 2009.
  100. ^ Keller, James M. "Program Notes- Ligeti: Lontano for Large Orchestra". San Francisco Symphony. Archived from the original on February 11, 2009. 
  101. ^ Kosman, Joshua (June 13, 2006). "György Ligeti—music scores used in '2001' film (obituary)". The San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved June 13, 2006. 
  102. ^ "Bell Labs: Where "Hal" First Spoke". (Bell Labs Speech Synthesis web site). Retrieved August 13, 2007. 
  103. ^ Chion, Michel (2001). Kubrick's Cinema Odyssey. translated by Claudia Gorbman. London: British Film Institute. ISBN 0-85170-840-4. 
  104. ^ Pruys, Guido Marc (1997). Die Rhetorik der Filmsynchronisation: Wie ausländische Spielfilme in Deutschland zensiert, verändert und gesehen werden (in German). Gunter Narr Verlag. p. 107. ISBN 3-8233-4283-5. 
  105. ^ Fini, Massimo (2009). Nietzsche. L'apolide dell'esistenza (in Italian). Marsilio Editori. pp. 408–9. ISBN 88-317-9722-0. 
  106. ^ David W. Patterson, "Music, Structure and Metaphor in Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey"." American Music, Vol. 22, No. 3 (Autumn, 2004), pp. 460–461
  107. ^ "royal society southbank centre". 2001: A Space Odyssey. 2010. Archived from the original on July 25, 2010. Retrieved August 11, 2010. 
  108. ^ "2001: A Space Odyssey". 2001: A Space Odyssey. 2013. Archived from the original on June 15, 2013. Retrieved June 15, 2013. 
  109. ^ "2001's Pre- and Post-Premiere Edits by Thomas E Brown". Retrieved January 27, 2012.  Kubrick and editor Ray Lovejoy edited the film between April 5 and April 9, 1968. Detailed instructions were sent to theatre owners already showing the film so that they could execute the specified trims themselves. This meant that some of the cuts may have been poorly done in a particular theatre, possibly causing the version seen by viewers early in the film's run to vary from theatre to theatre.
  110. ^ Freeman Dyson, Disturbing the Universe, 1979, pg 189–191, ISBN 0-330-26324-2
  111. ^ a b "2001's Pre- and Post-Premiere Edits by Thomas E Brown". Retrieved January 27, 2012. 
  112. ^ Agel 1970, p. 27.
  113. ^ "2001's Pre- and Post-Premiere Edits by Thomas E Brown". Retrieved January 27, 2012.  Unlike most articles on "The Kubrick Site" no author biography or earlier publication information is given.
  114. ^ Robley, Les Paul (February 1, 2008). "2001: A Space Odyssey (Blu-Ray review)". Audio-Video Revolution. Retrieved January 7, 2011. 
  115. ^ "2001: A Space Odyssey (Remastered)". www.dvd.net.au. Retrieved January 7, 2011. 
  116. ^ "Kubrick Questions Finally Answered – An In Depth Talk with Leon Vitali". Dvdtalk.com. Archived from the original on August 1, 2010. Retrieved August 22, 2010. 
  117. ^ Sciretta, Peter. "Warner Bros Responds: 17 Minutes of "Lost" '2001: A Space Odyssey' Footage Found?". slashfilm.com. Retrieved January 4, 2011. 
  118. ^ Sneider, Jeff (December 16, 2010). "WB Uncovers Lost Footage From Kubrick's '2001: A Space Odyssey'". Retrieved December 20, 2010. 
  119. ^ Burt, George (1995). The Art of Film Music. Northeastern University Press. p. 126. ISBN 978-1-55553-270-3. Retrieved October 16, 2011. 
  120. ^ a b BROWN, THOMAS E.; VENDY, PHIL (March 2, 2000). "A TASTE OF BLUE FOOD IN STANLEY KUBRICK'S 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY". Underview.com. Retrieved January 8, 2011. 
  121. ^ Coate, Michael. "1968: A Roadshow Odyssey- The Original Reserved Seat Engagements Of '2001: A Space Odyssey'". in70mm.com. Retrieved January 7, 2011. 
  122. ^ a b Coate, Michael. "1968: A Roadshow Odyssey- The Original Reserved Seat Engagements Of '2001: A Space Odyssey'". in70mm.com. Retrieved January 9, 2011. 
  123. ^ "6th Moscow International Film Festival (1969)". MIFF. Retrieved December 20, 2012. 
  124. ^ a b Hall, Sheldon (April 9, 2011). "Introduction to 2001: A Space Odyssey". In70mm.com. Retrieved March 20, 2012. 
  125. ^ 2001: A Re-Release Odyssey, Wired
  126. ^ Press Reviews: 2001: A Space Odyssey, BBC
  127. ^ Nielsen Business Media, Inc (1980). "MGM/CBS Home Video ad". Billboard Magazine (November 22, 1980). Retrieved April 20, 2011. 
  128. ^ 2001: A Space Odyssey at KRSJR Productions.com. Accessed September 16, 2009. Archived September 18, 2009.
  129. ^ "Stanley Kubrick Collection Official Authorized Site (Warner Bros)". Warner Bros. October 25, 2008. Archived from the original on September 3, 2010. Retrieved August 22, 2010. 
  130. ^ "Big Rental Films of 1968", Variety, January 8, 1969 p 15. This figure is a rental accruing to distributors.
  131. ^ Gilliatt, Penelope. "After Man", review of 2001 reprinted from The New Yorker in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-451-07139-5
  132. ^ Champlin, Charles. Review of 2001 reprinted from The Los Angeles Times in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-451-07139-5
  133. ^ Sweeney, Louise. Review of 2001 reprinted from The Christian Science Monitor in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-451-07139-5
  134. ^ French, Philip. Review of 2001 reprinted from an unnamed publication in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-451-07139-5
  135. ^ Adams, Marjorie. Review of 2001 reprinted from The Boston Globe in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-451-07139-5
  136. ^ Ebert, Roger. "BFI | Sight & Sound | Top Ten Poll 2002 – How the directors and critics voted". Archived from the original on July 29, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. 
  137. ^ Unknown reviewer. Capsule review of 2001 reprinted from Time in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-451-07139-5
  138. ^ "Scorsese's 12 favorite films". Miramax.com. Retrieved 25 December 2013. 
  139. ^ Duncan, Paul (2003), "Stanley Kubrick: The Complete Films", Taschen GmbH: 10–11, ISBN 978-3-8365-2775-0 
  140. ^ "How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love 'Barry Lyndon'". New York Times. Retrieved June 30, 2013. 
  141. ^ Stanley Kauffmann, "Lost in the Stars," The New Republic. Retrieved from http://www.krusch.com/kubrick/Q16.html
  142. ^ Adler, Renata. Review of 2001 reprinted from The New York Times in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-451-07139-5
  143. ^ Frederick, Robert B. (April 1, 1968). "Review: '2001: A Space Odyssey'". Variety. 
  144. ^ Sarris, Andrew. Review of 2001 review quoted from a WBAI radio broadcast in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-451-07139-5
  145. ^ "Hail the Conquering Hero". FilmComment.com. Retrieved January 12, 2007. 
  146. ^ Simon, John. Review of 2001 reprinted from The New Leader in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-451-07139-5
  147. ^ Joyce, Paul (director) Doran, Jamie (producer) Bizony, Piers (assoc. producer) (2001). 2001: The Making Of A Myth (Television production). UK: Channel Four Television Corp. Event occurs at 15:56. 
  148. ^ "BBC – Films – review – 2001: A Space Odyssey". BBC. Retrieved August 22, 2010. 
  149. ^ From both a review and a subsequent interview quoted in Brosnan, John (1978). Future Tense: The Cinema of Science Fiction. St. Martin's Press. p. 179. 
  150. ^ Delany's review and Del Rey's both appear in the 1968 anthology The Year's Best Science Fiction No. 2 edited by Harry Harrison and Brian W. Aldiss. Both reviews are also printed on The Kubrick Site, Del Rey's is at [1] and Delany's at [2]
  151. ^ a b "1969 Hugo Awards". World Science Fiction Society. Retrieved October 16, 2012. 
  152. ^ Anders, Charlie Jane. "R.I.P. hard science fiction writer James P. Hogan". io9. 
  153. ^ Kazan, Casey (July 10, 2009). "Ridley Scott: "After 2001 -A Space Odyssey, Science Fiction is Dead"". Dailygalaxy.com. Retrieved August 22, 2010. 
  154. ^ In Focus on the Science Fiction Film, edited by William Johnson. Englewood Cliff, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
  155. ^ DeMet, George D. "2001: A Space Odyssey Internet Resource Archive: The Search for Meaning in 2001". Palantir.net (originally an undergrad honors thesis). Retrieved August 22, 2010. 
  156. ^ "This Day in Science Fiction History — 2001: A Space Odyssey | Science Not Fiction | Discover Magazine". Blogs.discovermagazine.com. Retrieved August 22, 2010. 
  157. ^ The Making of Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty DVD packaged with European version of Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty
  158. ^ "Whole Earth or No Earth: The Origin of the Whole Earth Icon in the Ashes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki  地球全体か地球全滅か−−ヒロシマ・ナガサキの灰燼より浮上した地球の全体図 - The Asia-Pacific Journal". The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus. 
  159. ^ "Apple iPad vs Samsung Galaxy: Stanley Kubrick Showed Tablet in '2001: A Space Odyssey'". ABC News. 
  160. ^ Jones, Melanie (October 25, 2011). "iPhone 4S Siri Goes '2001: Space Odyssey': ThinkGeek's New IRIS 9000 [VIDEO]". International Business Times. Retrieved December 2, 2011. 
  161. ^ Some European Commission official reference is still available on CORDIS archive
  162. ^ Clarke, Arthur (1972). The lost Worlds of 2001. Sidgwick and Jackson. p. 50. ISBN 0-283-97904-6. 
  163. ^ "FILM NOMINATIONS 1968". British Academy of Film and Television Arts. Retrieved October 16, 2012. 
  164. ^ "Awards for 1968". National Board of Review of Motion Pictures. Retrieved October 16, 2012. 
  165. ^ "Winners: 1960s". Kansas City Film Critics Circle. Retrieved October 16, 2012. 
  166. ^ "Awards / History / 1968 - 21st Annual DGA Awards". Directors Guild of America. Retrieved October 16, 2012. 
  167. ^ O'Neil, Thomas (2003). Movie awards: the ultimate, unofficial guide to the Oscars, Golden Globes, critics, Guild & Indie honors. Perigee Book. p. 306. ISBN 978-0-399-52922-1. 
  168. ^ "Premios del CEC a la producción española de 1968". Círculo de Escritores Cinematográficos (in Spanish). Retrieved October 16, 2012. 
  169. ^ "Awards for Stanley Kubrick". L'accademia del Cinema Italiano (in Italian). Retrieved October 16, 2012. 
  170. ^ "AFI's 100 YEARS.". AFI.com. Archived from the original on June 5, 2011. Retrieved June 9, 2011. 
  171. ^ "2001: A Space Odyssey Named the Greatest Sci-Fi Film of All Time By the Online Film Critics Society". Online Film Critics Society. Archived from the original on November 26, 2006. Retrieved December 15, 2006. 
  172. ^ "National Film Registry Preservation Board". Library of Congress. September 12, 2011. Retrieved January 27, 2012. 
  173. ^ "Sight & Sound: Top Ten Poll 2002". British Film Institute web site. Archived from the original on December 16, 2006. Retrieved December 15, 2006. 
  174. ^ "USCCB – (Film and Broadcasting) – Vatican Best Films List". USCCB web site. Archived from the original on April 18, 2007. Retrieved April 22, 2007. 
  175. ^ "Top movies for schools revealed". BBC News. December 13, 2011. Retrieved January 4, 2012. 
  176. ^ "AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies" (PDF). American Film Institute. Retrieved November 13, 2014. 
  177. ^ "AFI's 100 Years...100 Thrills" (PDF). American Film Institute. Retrieved November 13, 2014. 
  178. ^ "AFI's 100 Years...100 Heroes & Villains" (PDF). American Film Institute. Retrieved November 13, 2014. 
  179. ^ "AFI's 100 Years...100 Movie Quotes" (PDF). American Film Institute. Retrieved November 13, 2014. 
  180. ^ "AFI's 100 Years...100 Movie Quotes Nominees" (PDF). American Film Institute. Retrieved November 13, 2014. 
  181. ^ "AFI's 100 Years...100 Cheers" (PDF). American Film Institute. Retrieved December 12, 2014. 
  182. ^ "AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies (10th Anniversary Edition)" (PDF). American Film Institute. Retrieved November 13, 2014. 
  183. ^ "AFI's 10 Top 10: Top 10 Sci-Fi". American Film Institute. Retrieved November 13, 2014. 
  184. ^ See especially the essay "Auteur with a Capital A" by James Gilbert anthologized in Kolker, Robert (2006). Stanley Kubrick's 2001: a space odyssey: new essays. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-517452-6. 
  185. ^ discussed for example in Stephanie Schwam's The making of 2001, a space odyssey Google's e-copy has no pagination
  186. ^ "The Film Director as Superstar" (Doubleday and Company: Garden City, New York, 1970) by Joseph Gelmis
  187. ^ Houston, Penelope (April 1, 1971). Sight and Sound International Film Quarterly, Volume 40 No. 2, Spring 1971. London: British Film Institute.
  188. ^ Sheridan, Chris. "Stanley Kubrick and Symbolism". Retrieved April 10, 2009. Reproducing 
  189. ^ a b Burfoot, Annette (2006). "The Fetal Voyager: Women in Modern Medical Visual Discourse". In Shteir, Ann; Lightman, Bernard. Figuring it out: science, gender, and visual culture. UPNE. p. 339. ISBN 978-1-58465-603-6. 
  190. ^ Grant, Barry Keith (2010). Shadows of Doubt: Negotiations of Masculinity in American Genre Films. Wayne State University Press. p. 135. ISBN 978-0-8143-3457-7. 
  191. ^ Ebert, Roger (March 27, 1997). "2001: A Space Odyssey". Chicago Sun-Times. 
  192. ^ reprinted in Schwam, Stephanie (2000). The making of 2001, a space odyssey. Random House. pp. 164–165. ISBN 0-375-75528-4. 
  193. ^ Geduld, Carolyn (1973). Filmguide to 2001: a space odyssey. Indiana University Press. pp. 40, 63. 
  194. ^ LoBrutto, Vincent (1999). Stanley Kubrick: A Biography. Da Capo Press. pp. 310, 606. ISBN 978-0-306-80906-4. 
  195. ^ Schwam, Stephanie (2000). The making of 2001, a space odyssey. Random House. pp. 164–165. ISBN 0-375-75528-4. 
  196. ^ See Tim Dirks' synopsis on the A.M.C. movie site.Dirks, Tim. "2001: A Space Odyssey". Filmsite.org. AMC. Retrieved February 25, 2011. 
  197. ^ See Tim Dirks' synopsis on the A.M.C. movie site.Dirks, Tim. "2001: A Space Odyssey". Filmsite.org. AMC. Retrieved February 25, 2011.  He says that in the ape encounter "With the mysterious monolith in the foreground, the glowing Sun rises over the black slab, directly beneath the crescent of the Moon" and that on the Moon "Again, the glowing Sun, Moon and Earth have formed a conjunctive orbital configuration."
  198. ^ See original Rolling Stone review by Bob McClay reproduced in Schwam, Stephanie (2000). The making of 2001, a space odyssey. 0375755284, 9780375755286: Random House. pp. 164–165. 
  199. ^ Ebert, Roger (April 12, 1968). "2001: A Space Odyssey". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved February 3, 2011. 
  200. ^ Webster, Patrick (2010). Love and Death in Kubrick: A Critical Study of the Films from Lolita Through Eyes Wide Shut. McFarland. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-7864-5916-2. 
  201. ^ Ebert, Roger (March 27, 1997). "2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved February 16, 2011. 
  202. ^ Caicco, Gregory (2007). Architecture, ethics, and the personhood of place. UPNE. p. 137. ISBN 978-1-58465-653-1. 
  203. ^ Westfahl, Gary (2005). The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy: Themes, Works, and Wonders, Volume 2. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 707. ISBN 978-0-313-32952-4. 
  204. ^ Christopher Palmer. 'Big Dumb Objects in Science Fiction: Sublimity, Banality, and Modernity,' Extrapolation. Kent: Spring 2006.Vol. 47, Iss. 1; page. 103
  205. ^ Mark Stetson (model shop supervisor) (1984). 2010: The Odyssey Continues (DVD). ZM Productions/MGM. Archived from the original on August 24, 2007. Retrieved August 31, 2007. 
  206. ^ "Starship Modeler: Modeling 2001 and 2010 Spacecraft". October 19, 2005. Archived from the original on August 20, 2006. Retrieved September 26, 2006. 
  207. ^ Bentley, Chris (2008). The Complete Gerry Anderson: The Authorised Episode Guide (4th edition). London: Reynolds and Hearn. ISBN 978-1-905287-74-1. 
  208. ^ STARLOG magazine
  209. ^ LoBrutto, Vincent. Stanley Kubrick . London: Faber & Faber Limited, 1997, p. 456.
  210. ^ "3001: The Final Odyssey" on Yahoo! Movies (via Wayback Machine)
  211. ^ [3][dead link] [4][dead link]
  212. ^ "Doug Gilford's Mad Cover Site - Mad #125". madcoversite.com. 
  213. ^ Agel 1970, pp. 8–9.
  214. ^ McMichael, Joe; Lyons, Jack (2001). The Who: Concert File. Omnibus Press. p. 480. ISBN 978-0-857-12737-2. 
  215. ^ Arthur, Charles (January 25, 1999). "Hal confesses all and joins Apple". The Independent (London). Retrieved November 26, 2010. 
  216. ^ Douglas, Clark (December 21, 2009). "DVD Verdict Review: The Mel Brooks Collection". DVD Verdict. Archived from the original on December 25, 2010. Retrieved November 26, 2010. 
  217. ^ Film and Filming, Volume 21 1975 p. 221
  218. ^ Dirks, Tim. "Sleeper(21973)". Filmsite.org. AMC Movie Classics. Archived from the original on December 5, 2010. Retrieved November 26, 2010. 
  219. ^ "Stanley and Bart ... another Kubrick legend". The Guardian (UK) (London). July 16, 1999. Retrieved November 26, 2010. 
  220. ^ Colin Kennedy (September 2004). "The Ten Best Movie Gags In The Simpsons". Empire. pp. 76.
  221. ^ 20 Funniest Futurama Film Parodies at gamesradar.com
  222. ^ Booker, Keith (2006). Drawn to Television - Prime-time Animation from the Flintstones to Family Guy. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 137. ISBN 978-0-313-07615-2. 
  223. ^ Davidson, James A. (1998). "The Director that Time Forgot". Images:A Journal of Fiilm and Popular Culture. Archived from the original on November 23, 2010. Retrieved November 26, 2010. 
  224. ^ Hartl, John (July 14, 2005). "'Chocolate Factory' is a tasty surprise". MSNBC. Retrieved December 5, 2010. 
  225. ^ Forbes, Harry (2005). "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory". Catholic News. Archived from the original on January 6, 2011. Retrieved December 4, 2010. 
  226. ^ Wortham, Jenna (June 18, 2008). "Retro Futurism of Wall-E Recalls 2001, Blade Runner". WIRED. Retrieved December 4, 2010. 
  227. ^ Moskowitz, Clara (June 27, 2008). "WALL-E spreads the robot love". USA Today. Retrieved December 4, 2010. 
  228. ^ Toppman, Lawrence. "Well-focused 'Eye' has a crazy vision". Charlotte Observer. Retrieved December 4, 2010. 
  229. ^ London Magazine, 2006 (issue needed), p. 40
  230. ^ A few reference biographies or obituaries for Leslie Nielsen speak as if Space Travesty was a spoof of Kubrick's film.Bolam, Sarah Miles; Bolam, Thomas J. (2011). Fictional Presidential Films: A Comprehensive Filmography of Portrayals from 1930 to 2011. Xlibris Corporation. p. 243. ISBN 1-4628-9318-X. Retrieved December 10, 2011.  "Leslie Nielsen 1926–2010" (OBITUARY PROMOTING FORTHCOMING DAYLONG NIELSEN MARATHON ON SKY NETWORK). Sky Movies HD. Archived from the original on January 7, 2011. Retrieved December 10, 2010. 
  231. ^ Nielsen's Airplane which was a scene-for-scene parody of Zero Hour. Abrahams, Jim; Zucker, David; Zucker, Jerry; Davidson, Jon (2000). Airplane! DVD audio commentary (DVD). Paramount Pictures.  Several other films of his were also full parodies of another film.
  232. ^ Pritchett, D. W. (March 18, 2002). "2001: A Space Travesty". DVD Empire. Retrieved December 10, 2010. 
  233. ^ Slotek, Jim (December 1, 2001). "A big empty Space". Jam! Showbiz. Retrieved December 10, 2010. 
  234. ^ Garabedian, Berge (2010). "(review of) 2001: A Space Travesty". JoBlo Movie Reviews. Retrieved December 8, 2010. 
  235. ^ "Airplane II – The Sequel". scificolony.canaryzoo.com. Retrieved February 21, 2011. 
  236. ^ Naugle, Patrick (November 9, 2000). "Airplane ii: the sequel". DVD Verdict. Retrieved February 21, 2011. 
  237. ^ Finkleman, Ken. "Airplane II: The Sequel". The Spinning Image. Retrieved February 21, 2011. 
  238. ^ Klafter, Erick (April 23, 2003). "Airplane II: The Sequel". The BoxSet. Retrieved February 21, 2011. 
  239. ^ "Mystery Science Theater 3000 (1998)". Art of the Title. Retrieved October 20, 2014. 
  240. ^ Robert G. Weiner, Shelley E. Barba, ed. (2011). In the Peanut Gallery with Mystery Science Theater 3000: Essays on Film, Fandom, Technology and the Culture of Riffing. McFarland. p. 175. ISBN 0786485728. 
  241. ^ Humanick, Rob (2013-09-04). "Mystery Science Theater 3000: The Movie". Slant Magazine. Retrieved 2014-10-20. 
  242. ^ Svetkey, Benjamin (January 13, 1995). "Videogame Review: SimEarth". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved October 17, 2009. 
  243. ^ Metal Gear Solid Official Missions Handbook, Millennium Books (1998).
  244. ^ Kojima Productions. "Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker". Briefing Files -> Huey -> Strangelove -> '2001: A Space Odyssey' 
  245. ^ Voecks, Krystalle (2009-02-09). "One Shots: An EVE easter egg". Engadget. Retrieved 2015-04-14. 

Further reading

This page is based on data from Wikipedia (read/edit), Freebase, Amazon and YouTube under respective licenses.
Text is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.